Pragmatic Reasoning With a Point of View

Abstract Cheng and Holyoak (1985) proposed that realistic reasoning in deontic contexts is based on pragmatic schemas such as those for assessing compliance with or violation of permission and obligation rules, and that the evocation of these schemas can facilitate performance in Wason's (1966) selection task. A number of investigators have since obtained evidence that the dominant pattern of selections for deontic rules can be reversed from the so-called “logical” pattern, p & not-q, to not-p & q, by manipulating subjects' perspective. We show that such selection reversals can be derived from the theory of pragmatic schemas given an analysis of the complementarity of rights (which underlie the permission schema) and duties (which underlie the obligation schema). The theory predicts that the not-p & q combination will be obtained equally often for two superficially different conditions: an ambiguous rule, nominally stated in the form if p then q, presented within a context that encourages mapping to a par...

[1]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  Judgements of Deontic Relevance in Reasoning: A Reply to Jackson and Griggs , 1992 .

[2]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Stephen A. Yachanin,et al.  The effect of thematic content on cognitive strategies in the four-card selection task , 1982 .

[4]  Agnès Blaye,et al.  Children's performance in the selection task: Plausibility and familiarity , 1989 .

[5]  M. Braine,et al.  A Theory of If: A Lexical Entry, Reasoning Program, and Pragmatic Principles , 1991 .

[6]  L. Rips.  Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning. , 1983 .

[7]  Patricia W. Cheng,et al.  Pragmatic constraints on causal deduction , 1993 .

[8]  D. E. Over,et al.  Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals , 1991, Cognition.

[9]  K. Holyoak,et al.  On the natural selection of reasoning theories , 1989, Cognition.

[10]  G. Politzer,et al.  Reasoning about Conditional Promises and Warnings: Darwinian Algorithms, Mental Models, Relevance Judgements or Pragmatic Schemas? , 1992 .

[11]  Brian F. Chellas.  Modal Logic: Normal systems of modal logic , 1980 .

[12]  P. N. Johnson.  Reasoning and a Sense of Reality. , 1972 .

[13]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  K. Kirby,et al.  Probabilities and utilities of fictional outcomes in Wason's four-card selection task , 1994, Cognition.

[15]  K J Holyoak,et al.  Evoking the Permission Schema: The Impact of Explicit Negation and a Violation-Checking Context , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  N. Isaacs,et al.  Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning: And Other Legal Essays , 2010 .

[17]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change , 1992, Cognition.

[18]  Richard D. Platt,et al.  Darwinian algorithms and the Wason selection task: A factorial analysis of social contract selection task problems , 1993, Cognition.

[19]  L. Cosmides.  The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[20]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[21]  Karl Halvor Teigen,et al.  To be convincing or to be right: A question of preciseness: K.J. Gilhooly, M.T.G. Keane, R.H. Logie and G. Erdös (eds.), Lines of Thinking (Wiley, Chichester, 1990) 299–313 , 1990 .

[22]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  Pragmatic schemas and logical reasoning in 6- to 8-year-old children , 1989 .

[23]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[24]  P. Legrenzi,et al.  Children's reasoning on conditional promises and permissions , 1990 .

[25]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  Pragmatic Schemas and Conditional Reasoning in Children , 1988 .

[26]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Modal reasoning, models, and Manktelow and Over , 1992, Cognition.

[27]  Richard A. Griggs,et al.  The elusive thematic‐materials effect in Wason's selection task , 1982 .

[28]  Nick Chater,et al.  A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .

[29]  T. Wickens.  Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[30]  P. Pollard.  Natural selection for the selection task: limits to social exchange theory , 1990, Cognition.

[31]  D. E. Over,et al.  Utility and deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-Laird and Byrne , 1992, Cognition.