Using total error as decision criterion in analytical method transfer

An analytical transfer is a complete process that consists in transferring a validated analytical method from a sending laboratory (called sender) to a receiving laboratory (called receiver) after having experimentally demonstrated that it also masters the method. The decision to transfer an analytical method is usually taken based on the combination of two criteria: one about systematic error and one about random errors. These usual criteria, their combination and their limitations are described in this paper. As it is for method validation, total error-based approaches should be also considered in method transfer. Two approaches are proposed in order to have a total error-based criterion and to take into account the precision of the true value estimate. In the first approach, a beta-expectation tolerance interval similar to the one used in method validation is calculated and then compared to acceptance limits around the estimate of the true value. The second approach, found as slightly more powerful than the first one, consists in estimating the probability to have a result outside these acceptance limits. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Christophe Agut,et al.  A Unified Approach for Design and Analysis of Transfer Studies for Analytical Methods , 2001 .

[2]  P. Chiap,et al.  An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progress and limitations. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[3]  David Hoffman,et al.  TWO-SIDED TOLERANCE INTERVALS FOR BALANCED AND UNBALANCED RANDOM EFFECTS MODELS , 2005, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  Robert W. Mee β-Expectation and β-Content Tolerance Limits for Balanced One-Way ANOVA Random Model@@@b-Expectation and b-Content Tolerance Limits for Balanced One-Way ANOVA Random Model , 1984 .

[5]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Application of the equivalence test according to a concept for analytical method transfers from the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[6]  M Laurentie,et al.  Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. A SFSTP proposal--part II. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  Donald J. Schuirmann A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[8]  Robert W. Mee Estimation of the percentage of a normal distribution lying outside a specified interval , 1988 .

[9]  B. Govaerts,et al.  The transfer of a LC-UV method for the determination of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid in Lidoses: use of total error as decision criterion. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[10]  Robert W. Mee β-Expectation and β-Content Tolerance Limits for Balanced One-Way ANOVA Random Model , 1984 .

[11]  Jérôme Vial,et al.  Methodology for transfer of liquid chromatography methods based on statistical considerations , 1998 .

[12]  F. Minois-Offroy,et al.  Transfert des méthodes analytiques: Méthodologie , 2002 .

[13]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Reappraisal of hypothesis testing for method validation : detection of systematic error by comparing the means of two methods or of two laboratories , 1995 .