Damage, Healing, and Remodeling in Optogenetic Skeletal Muscle Bioactuators

A deeper understanding of biological materials and the design principles that govern them, combined with the enabling technology of 3D printing, has given rise to the idea of "building with biology." Using these materials and tools, bio-hybrid robots or bio-bots, which adaptively sense and respond to their environment, can be manufactured. Skeletal muscle bioactuators are developed to power these bio-bots, and an approach is presented to make them dynamically responsive to changing environmental loads and robustly resilient to induced damage. Specifically, since the predominant cause of skeletal muscle loss of function is mechanical damage, the underlying mechanisms of damage are investigated in vitro, and an in vivo inspired healing strategy is developed to counteract this damage. The protocol that is developed yields complete recovery of healthy tissue functionality within two days of damage, setting the stage for a more robust, resilient, and adaptive bioactuator technology than previously demonstrated. Understanding and exploiting the adaptive response behaviors inherent within biological systems in this manner is a crucial step forward in designing bio-hybrid machines that are broadly applicable to grand engineering challenges.

[1]  Shahragim Tajbakhsh,et al.  Adult skeletal muscle stem cells. , 2015, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[2]  R. Bashir,et al.  Creating Living Cellular Machines , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Barbara Gayraud-Morel,et al.  A role for the myogenic determination gene Myf5 in adult regenerative myogenesis. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[4]  Teppo L N Järvinen,et al.  Muscle Injuries , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Muscular Thin Films for Building Actuators and Powering Devices , 2007, Science.

[6]  Cunming Duan,et al.  Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF receptors, and IGF-binding proteins: roles in skeletal muscle growth and differentiation. , 2010, General and comparative endocrinology.

[7]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Bioinspiration: something for everyone , 2015, Interface Focus.

[8]  H. Kong,et al.  Directed Blood Vessel Growth Using an Angiogenic Microfiber/Microparticle Composite Patch , 2011, Advanced materials.

[9]  H. Asada,et al.  Utilization and control of bioactuators across multiple length scales. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication , 2015, Science.

[11]  F. Melchels,et al.  A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[12]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Optogenetic skeletal muscle-powered adaptive biological machines , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Swathi Rangarajan,et al.  Use of Flow, Electrical, and Mechanical Stimulation to Promote Engineering of Striated Muscles , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Sara Mantero,et al.  Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: strategies for volumetric constructs , 2014, Front. Physiol..

[15]  J. Spudich,et al.  Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps , 1994, Nature.

[16]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: methods to form skeletal myotubes and their applications. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[17]  Megan L. McCain,et al.  A tissue-engineered jellyfish with biomimetic propulsion , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Stereolithographic 3D Bioprinting for Biomedical Applications , 2015 .

[19]  R. Bashir,et al.  Development of Miniaturized Walking Biological Machines , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Louise Deldicque,et al.  A novel bioreactor for stimulating skeletal muscle in vitro. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[21]  H. Vandenburgh,et al.  Mechanical stimulation improves tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[22]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Bio‐Inspired, Smart, Multiscale Interfacial Materials , 2008 .

[24]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  Use it or lose it: multiscale skeletal muscle adaptation to mechanical stimuli , 2014, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[25]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  New Materials through Bioinspiration and Nanoscience , 2013 .

[26]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Three-dimensionally printed biological machines powered by skeletal muscle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Scott R White,et al.  Self‐Healing of Internal Damage in Synthetic Vascular Materials , 2010, Advanced materials.

[28]  Adam W Feinberg,et al.  Engineered skeletal muscle tissue for soft robotics: fabrication strategies, current applications, and future challenges. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[29]  H. Vandenburgh,et al.  Insulin and IGF-I induce pronounced hypertrophy of skeletal myofibers in tissue culture. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  S. Dedieu,et al.  Involvement of myogenic regulator factors during fusion in the cell line C2C12. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[31]  Clément Sanchez,et al.  Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems , 2005, Nature materials.

[32]  Phelim Bradley,et al.  Corrigendum: Rapid antibiotic-resistance predictions from genome sequence data for Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2016, Nature Communications.

[33]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[34]  Ritu Raman,et al.  A modular approach to the design, fabrication, and characterization of muscle-powered biological machines , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[35]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[36]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-Assembly at All Scales , 2002, Science.

[37]  N. Sottos,et al.  Restoration of Large Damage Volumes in Polymers , 2014, Science.

[38]  Adam W Feinberg,et al.  Biological Soft Robotics. , 2015, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[39]  J. Lewis,et al.  Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. , 2007, Nature materials.

[40]  L. Griffith,et al.  Tissue Engineering--Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities , 2002, Science.

[41]  Vahid Hosseini,et al.  Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: Methods to Form Skeletal Myotubes and Their Applications , 2014 .

[42]  Dominik Rünzler,et al.  A novel bioreactor for the generation of highly aligned 3D skeletal muscle-like constructs through orientation of fibrin via application of static strain. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.