Inferring the Location and Effect of Tumor Suppressor Genes by Instability‐Selection Modeling of Allelic‐Loss Data

Summary. Cancerous tumor growth creates cells with abnormal DNA. Allelic‐loss experiments identify genomic deletions in cancer cells, but sources of variation and intrinsic dependencies complicate inference about the location and effect of suppressor genes; such genes are the target of these experiments and are thought to be involved in tumor development. We investigate properties of an instability‐selection model of allelic‐loss data, including likelihood‐based parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. By considering a special complete‐data case, we derive an approximate calibration method for hypothesis tests of sporadic deletion. Parametric bootstrap and Bayesian computations are also developed. Data from three allelic‐loss studies are reanalyzed to illustrate the methods.

[1]  J. Dickey The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location Parameters , 1971 .

[2]  Barry R. Chiswick,et al.  Appendix A: Data Sets , 1974 .

[3]  D. Aldous Probability Approximations via the Poisson Clumping Heuristic , 1988 .

[4]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. , 1990, Science.

[5]  E Feingold,et al.  Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  P. Devilee,et al.  PCR-based microsatellite polymorphisms in the detection of loss of heterozygosity in fresh and archival tumour tissue. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Boundary-Crossing Probability,et al.  MARKOV PROCESSES FOR MODELING AND ANALYZING A NEW GENETIC MAPPING METHOD , 1993 .

[8]  L. Tierney Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[9]  J. Trempe Molecular biology of the cell, 3rd edition Bruce Alberts, Dennis Bray, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts and James D. Watson, Garland Publishing, 1994, 559.95 (xiii + 1294 pages), ISBN 0-815-31619-4 , 1995, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[10]  P. Guttorp Stochastic modeling of scientific data , 1995 .

[11]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Asymptotic Approximations , 1997 .

[12]  O. Cussenot,et al.  Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 16q in prostate adenocarcinoma: identification of three independent regions. , 1997, Cancer research.

[13]  H. Döhner,et al.  Matrix‐based comparative genomic hybridization: Biochips to screen for genomic imbalances , 1997, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[14]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Variations on a Theme: Cataloging Human DNA Sequence Variation , 1997, Science.

[15]  L. Meisner,et al.  A juvenile polyposis tumor suppressor locus at 10q22 is deleted from nonepithelial cells in the lamina propria. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[16]  B Johansson,et al.  Chromosomal imbalance maps of malignant solid tumors: a cytogenetic survey of 3185 neoplasms. , 1997, Cancer research.

[17]  C. Larsson,et al.  Differential loss of heterozygosity in the region of the Cowden locus within 10q22-23 in follicular thyroid adenomas and carcinomas. , 1997, Cancer research.

[18]  H. Müller,et al.  Statistical methods for DNA sequence segmentation , 1998 .

[19]  M A Newton,et al.  On the statistical analysis of allelic-loss data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[21]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  The problem of regions , 1998 .

[22]  M. Newton,et al.  A Statistical Analysis of Cancer Genome Variation , 1999 .