Effects of digital filtering on peak acceleration and force measurements for artistic gymnastics skills

ABSTRACT Low-pass filters are ideal when filtering human movements, however the effectiveness of such filters relies on the correct selection of the cut-off frequency. The aim of this study was to determine the most appropriate filter cut-off for acceleration- and force-time data when measuring peak resultant acceleration (PRA) and ground reaction force (PRGRF) during gymnastics landings. Sixteen gymnasts executed backward handsprings and backward somersault landings onto a matted force plate while wearing four inertial measurement units (IMUs). Acceleration- and force-time data were filtered using a fourth-order Butterworth filter at different cut-off frequencies ranging from raw through to 250 Hz. Residual analysis plots were produced, and the PRGRF and PRA for all IMUs were calculated for each participant and skill at all cut-off frequencies. Descriptive statistics, model II linear regressions and Bland-Altman plots were conducted. Results indicated that a minimum 85 Hz cut-off is optimal. High cut-off frequencies (>80 Hz) showed good linear relationships and had minimal mean bias compared with raw values, indicating that either filtered (above ~85 Hz) or raw signals can be used. It is suggested that for applied sports settings no filtering is needed, however a minimum cut-off of 85 Hz should be implemented for research purposes.

[1]  R. Bahamonde,et al.  Effect of endpoint conditions on position and velocity near impact in tennis , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  Darin A Padua,et al.  Sagittal-plane trunk position, landing forces, and quadriceps electromyographic activity. , 2009, Journal of athletic training.

[3]  Chantal Simons,et al.  Do accelerometers mounted on the back provide a good estimate of impact loads in jumping and landing tasks? , 2016, Sports biomechanics.

[4]  G. Giakas,et al.  Optimal digital filtering requires a different cut-off frequency strategy for the determination of the higher derivatives. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Valentina Camomilla,et al.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review , 2018, Sensors.

[6]  K. An,et al.  Estimate of the Optimum Cutoff Frequency for the Butterworth Low-Pass Digital Filter , 1999 .

[7]  Lina E. Lundgren,et al.  Comparison of impact forces, accelerations and ankle range of motion in surfing-related landing tasks , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[8]  Steven T. McCaw,et al.  Ground Reaction Forces Among Gymnasts and Recreational Athletes in Drop Landings. , 2003, Journal of athletic training.

[9]  Brad Aisbett,et al.  Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  G. Trewartha,et al.  Excessive fluctuations in knee joint moments during early stance in sprinting are caused by digital filtering procedures. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[11]  T J Koh,et al.  Technique and ground reaction forces in the back handspring , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  J L McNitt-Gray,et al.  Mechanical demand and multijoint control during landing depend on orientation of the body segments relative to the reaction force. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  L. K. Stergioulas,et al.  Automatic algorithm for filtering kinematic signals with impacts in the Wigner representation , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  Izaak Walton,et al.  Continuous Data Analyses: Correlation and Regression , 2008 .

[15]  Kelly R Sheerin,et al.  The one-week and six-month reliability and variability of three-dimensional tibial acceleration in runners* , 2017, Sports biomechanics.

[16]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  Biomechanical approaches to understanding the potentially injurious demands of gymnastic-style impact landings , 2012, Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology.

[17]  J M TANNER,et al.  Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. , 1949, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  W. A. Sparrow,et al.  Identifying Heel Contact and Toe-Off Using Forceplate Thresholds with a Range of Digital-Filter Cutoff Frequencies , 2003 .

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[20]  Koray S Erer,et al.  Adaptive usage of the Butterworth digital filter. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Antonie J van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.