Galaxy redshift surveys with sparse sampling

Survey observations of the three-dimensional locations of galaxies are a powerful approach to measure the distribution of matter in the universe, which can be used to learn about the nature of dark energy, physics of inflation, neutrino masses, etc. A competitive survey, however, requires a large volume (e.g., Vsurvey ~ 10Gpc3) to be covered, and thus tends to be expensive. A ``sparse sampling'' method offers a more affordable solution to this problem: within a survey footprint covering a given survey volume, Vsurvey, we observe only a fraction of the volume. The distribution of observed regions should be chosen such that their separation is smaller than the length scale corresponding to the wavenumber of interest. Then one can recover the power spectrum of galaxies with precision expected for a survey covering a volume of Vsurvey (rather than the volume of the sum of observed regions) with the number density of galaxies given by the total number of observed galaxies divided by Vsurvey (rather than the number density of galaxies within an observed region). We find that regularly-spaced sampling yields an unbiased power spectrum with no window function effect, and deviations from regularly-spaced sampling, which are unavoidable in realistic surveys, introduce calculable window function effects and increase the uncertainties of the recovered power spectrum. On the other hand, we show that the two-point correlation function (pair counting) is not affected by sparse sampling. While we discuss the sparse sampling method within the context of the forthcoming Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment, the method is general and can be applied to other galaxy surveys.

[1]  Scott Dodelson,et al.  The Effect of Covariance Estimator Error on Cosmological Parameter Constraints , 2013, 1304.2593.

[2]  R. Nichol,et al.  VIPERS: An Unprecedented View of Galaxies and Large-Scale Structure Halfway Back in the Life of the Universe , 2013, 1303.3930.

[3]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Sparsely sampling the sky: a Bayesian experimental design approach , 2012, 1212.3194.

[4]  Ralf Bender,et al.  VIRUS: production of a massively replicated 33k fiber integral field spectrograph for the upgraded Hobby-Eberly Telescope , 2012, Other Conferences.

[5]  Daniel Thomas,et al.  The clustering of galaxies in the sdss-iii baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations in the data release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample , 2012, 1312.4877.

[6]  A. Refregier,et al.  3D spherical analysis of baryon acoustic oscillations , 2011, 1112.3100.

[7]  J.-L. Starck,et al.  3DEX: a code for fast spherical Fourier-Bessel decomposition of 3D surveys , 2011, 1111.3591.

[8]  Ulrich Hopp,et al.  THE HETDEX PILOT SURVEY. II. THE EVOLUTION OF THE Lyα ESCAPE FRACTION FROM THE ULTRAVIOLET SLOPE AND LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF 1.9 , 2010, 1011.0430.

[9]  Ulrich Hopp,et al.  HETDEX pilot survey for emission-line galaxies - I. Survey design, performance, and catalog , 2010, 1011.0426.

[10]  Ralf Bender,et al.  VIRUS: a massively replicated 33k fiber integral field spectrograph for the upgraded Hobby-Eberly Telescope , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  Matthew Colless,et al.  The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z = 0.6 galaxy power spectrum , 2010, 1003.5721.

[12]  Alexander S. Szalay,et al.  Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 luminous red galaxies (vol 404, pg 60, 2010) , 2009, 0907.1659.

[13]  Ulrich Hopp,et al.  THE HETDEX PILOT SURVEY. I. SURVEY DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, AND CATALOG OF EMISSION-LINE GALAXIES , 2010 .

[14]  D. O. Astronomy,et al.  The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results , 2008, 0806.0183.

[15]  Eiichiro Komatsu,et al.  PERTURBATION THEORY RELOADED. II. NONLINEAR BIAS, BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS, AND MILLENNIUM SIMULATION IN REAL SPACE , 2008, 0805.2632.

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , 2007 .

[17]  E. Komatsu,et al.  Perturbation Theory Reloaded: Analytical Calculation of Nonlinearity in Baryonic Oscillations in the Real-Space Matter Power Spectrum , 2006, astro-ph/0604075.

[18]  R. Nichol,et al.  Universal fitting formulae for baryon oscillation surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0510239.

[19]  R. Ellis,et al.  The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications , 2005, astro-ph/0501174.

[20]  Y. Jing,et al.  Correcting for the Alias Effect When Measuring the Power Spectrum Using a Fast Fourier Transform , 2004, astro-ph/0409240.

[21]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[22]  R. Nichol,et al.  The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[23]  Y. Suto,et al.  Probability Distribution Function of Cosmological Density Fluctuations from a Gaussian Initial Condition: Comparison of One-Point and Two-Point Lognormal Model Predictions with N-Body Simulations , 2001, astro-ph/0105218.

[24]  Niall Gaffney,et al.  Early performance and present status of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[25]  Max Tegmark Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Galaxy Surveys , 1997, astro-ph/9706198.

[26]  A. Szalay,et al.  Bias and variance of angular correlation functions , 1993 .

[27]  J. Peacock,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of three-dimensional redshift surveys , 1993, astro-ph/9304022.

[28]  N. Kaiser A sparse-sampling strategy for the estimation of large-scale clustering from redshift surveys , 1986 .

[29]  A. N. TaylorDekel A Spherical Harmonic Analysis of Redshift Space , 2022 .