Testing the Sampling-Based NUSS-RF Tool for the Nuclear Data—Related Global Sensitivity Analysis with Monte Carlo Neutronics Calculations

Abstract NUSS-RF is a tool for nuclear data uncertainty propagation through neutronics calculations with continuous-energy Monte Carlo codes and ACE-formatted nuclear data libraries. Many existing codes, including the original version of NUSS (Nuclear data Uncertainty Stochastic Sampling), are based on simple random sampling algorithms. The NUSS-RF extension now uses a frequency-based sampling algorithm, called the random balance design (RBD), to analyze individual nuclear data uncertainty contributions in regard to the total output (e.g., keff) uncertainty. The implementation of the RBD method into NUSS-RF is initially verified by comparing the computed individual input variance contributions with analytical solutions for two analytical test cases. As well, it is assessed against the alternative approach based on the use of correlation coefficients. NUSS-RF is then used for an analysis of the Jezebel and Godiva fast-spectrum criticality benchmarks: in a first step, the overall effect of the 239Pu(n,f) and 235U(n,f) cross-section uncertainties on keff is evaluated, while in a second step, the contributions from the individual energy groups are quantified. As an additional verification, the NUSS-RF results are assessed against sensitivity and uncertainty analysis based on perturbation theory, showing good agreement between the two solutions. Finally, the capability of NUSS-RF is demonstrated for ranking the input parameters with respect to their influence on the total uncertainty of the output parameters, taking into account possible correlations between input parameters. Possible future improvements for the current computational scheme are discussed in the conclusions.

[1]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[2]  Ting Zhu,et al.  Sampling-Based Nuclear Data Uncertainty Quantification for Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Codes , 2015 .

[3]  Horst Glaeser,et al.  GRS Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation of Code Results and Applications , 2008 .

[4]  K. Shuler,et al.  A STUDY OF THE SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS . II , 2014 .

[5]  Fabrice Gamboa,et al.  Local Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs , 2008, Technometrics.

[6]  Christopher M. Perfetti,et al.  Advanced Monte Carlo Methods for Eigenvalue Sensitivity Coefficient Calculations. , 2012 .

[7]  Stephen M. Bowman,et al.  SCALE 6: Comprehensive Nuclear Safety Analysis Code System , 2011 .

[8]  H. Glaeser,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a post-experiment calculation in thermal hydraulics , 1994 .

[9]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[10]  F. Brown,et al.  Adjoint-Based k-Eigenvalue Sensitivity Coefficients to Nuclear Data Using Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo , 2013 .

[11]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[12]  Alexander Vasiliev,et al.  NUSS: A tool for propagating multigroup nuclear data covariances in pointwise ACE-formatted nuclear data using stochastic sampling method , 2015 .

[13]  J. Leppänen,et al.  Calculation of effective point kinetics parameters in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo code , 2014 .

[14]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work , 2008 .

[16]  Sitakanta Mohanty,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Bradley T Rearden,et al.  A Statistical Sampling Method for Uncertainty Analysis with SCALE and XSUSA , 2013 .

[18]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .

[19]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  A. Saltelli,et al.  An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) , 1998 .

[21]  P. Bokov,et al.  METHOD FOR CALCULATION OF GLOBAL SENSITIVITY INDICES FOR FEW-GROUP CROSS-SECTION-DEPENDENT PROBLEMS , 2011 .

[22]  I. Sobol,et al.  About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output , 1995 .

[23]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  APPLICATION OF GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS APPROACH TO EXERCISE I-1 OF THE OECD LWR UAM BENCHMARK , 2009 .

[24]  Raouf Doss,et al.  On Mean Motion , 1957 .

[25]  William A. Wieselquist,et al.  Comparison of Two Approaches for Nuclear Data Uncertainty Propagation in MCNPX for Selected Fast Spectrum Critical Benchmarks , 2014 .

[26]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[27]  William A. Wieselquist,et al.  PSI Methodologies for Nuclear Data Uncertainty Propagation with CASMO-5M and MCNPX: Results for OECD/NEA UAM Benchmark Phase I , 2013 .

[28]  M. Williams,et al.  Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Capabilities and Data in SCALE , 2011 .

[29]  Petter Helgesson,et al.  Efficient Use of Monte Carlo: Uncertainty Propagation , 2014 .

[30]  Y. Nagaya,et al.  Impact of Perturbed Fission Source on the Effective Multiplication Factor in Monte Carlo Perturbation Calculations , 2005 .

[31]  Kiril Velkov,et al.  Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in sampling based nuclear data uncertainty and sensitivity analyses , 2012 .

[32]  J. Favorite On the Accuracy of the Differential Operator Monte Carlo Perturbation Method for Eigenvalue Problems , 2009 .

[33]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output , 1999, Technometrics.

[34]  K. Shuler,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. III. Analysis of the approximations , 1975 .

[35]  Kiril Velkov,et al.  Status of XSUSA for Sampling Based Nuclear Data Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis , 2013 .

[36]  Eduard Hofer,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in the context of uncertainty analysis for computationally intensive models , 1999 .

[37]  M. Pecchia,et al.  TOWARDS APPLICATION OF A NEUTRON CROSS-SECTION UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION CAPABILITY IN THE CRITICALITY SAFETY METHODOLOGY , 2015 .

[38]  H. Rief Generalized Monte Carlo perturbation algorithms for correlated sampling and a second-order Taylor series approach , 1984 .

[39]  Francisco Javier Elorza,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  K. Velkov,et al.  NUCLEAR DATA UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS WITH XSUSA FOR FUEL ASSEMBLY DEPLETION CALCULATIONS , 2014 .

[41]  S. Tarantola,et al.  NUSS-RF: stochastic sampling-based tool for nuclear data sensitivity and uncertainty quantification , 2015 .

[42]  Hugo J. Hahn ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY , 1983 .

[43]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[44]  B. Rearden Perturbation Theory Eigenvalue Sensitivity Analysis with Monte Carlo Techniques , 2004 .

[45]  Hakim Ferroukhi,et al.  Criticality Safety Evaluation of a Swiss wet storage pool using a global uncertainty analysis methodology , 2015 .

[46]  H. Shim,et al.  Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses in Monte Carlo Forward Calculations , 2011 .