An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities

Purpose – A large variety of online communities have emerged during the last years as a result of the challenges faced by both the business and scientific worlds. This trend has also been promoted by the development of internet and new Web 2.0 technologies. In this context, this paper is focused on the determinants of success of online communities. But, as a difference from other studies, these determinants are analyzed from the social network analysis perspective. Several constructs related to the community organization as a social network are proposed and their interrelations are hypothesized in a general research framework. The obtained results test the proposed model providing the most relevant antecedents of the project success.Design/methodology/approach – A case study based on Linux ports to non‐conventional processor and environments is used to test the proposed model. Structural equation modeling analysis is used to validate the structural proposed model.Findings – The main antecedents of online ...

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[3]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Defining Open Source Software Project Success , 2003, ICIS.

[6]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[7]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2002 .

[8]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts , 2002 .

[9]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory: NY. , 1978 .

[10]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[11]  K. Jöreskog.  A general method for analysis of covariance structures , 1970 .

[12]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  IT takes a village: Virtual communities in support of education , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  T. R. Madanmohan,et al.  Roles and Knowledge Management in Online Technology Communities: An Ethnography Study , 2002, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[14]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[15]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[16]  Yu-Chen Chen,et al.  The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty , 2006, Internet Res..

[17]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[18]  Jin Xu,et al.  A Topological Analysis of the Open Souce Software Development Community , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  Analysis of utility and use of a web-based tool for digital signal processing teaching by means of a technological acceptance model , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  Implementation of a web-based educational tool for digital signal processing teaching using the technological acceptance model , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[21]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects , 2006, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[22]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[25]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Michael A. Fontaine,et al.  Knowledge and Communities , 2000 .

[27]  James M. Bieman,et al.  The FreeBSD project: a replication case study of open source development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[28]  Joon Koh,et al.  Encouraging participation in virtual communities , 2007, CACM.

[29]  Bart Selman,et al.  Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering , 1997, CACM.

[30]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[31]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Cohesion , 2005 .

[32]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[33]  Leanne Trembath,et al.  Determinants of success for online communities: an empirical study , 2011 .

[34]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Justine Cassell,et al.  How to Win a World Election: Emergent Leadership in an International Online Community , 2005 .

[36]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  A Methodological Framework for Socio-Cognitive Analyses of Collaborative Design of Open Source Software , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[37]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[38]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[39]  J. Alborsa,et al.  New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  A socio-cognitive analysis of online design discussions in an Open Source Software community , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[43]  Jason Martin,et al.  Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  eDSPLab: remote laboratory for experiments on DSP applications , 2008, Internet Res..

[45]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  Social Networks: From the Web to the Enterprise , 2002, IEEE Internet Comput..

[46]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[47]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area 1 , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[48]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[49]  Ned Kock,et al.  Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: an action research investigation of electronic communication in process improvement groups , 2001 .