Kernel Composition with the one-against-one Cascade for Integrating External Knowledge into SVM Classification

Summary: This work focuses on two main questions. How can data fusion be performed before SVM (support vector machine) classi›cation? And secondly: how can the one-against-one cascade be exploited to use information selectively thus integrating human knowledge? Kernel composition represents a specialized method for fusing data on the feature level. Its main advantage is given by the fact that it reduces the Hughes phenomenon (performance decrease due to high dimensionality) because it abstains from raising dimensionality in the feature space. Since the paper focuses on hyperspectral data, a specialized kernel based on the spectral angle is employed and evaluated. Two application schemes are presented. At ›rst, hyperspectral data are fused with laserscanning data by taking into account explicit knowledge on roof geometries. Secondly, a spectral-spatial framework forhyperspectraldataispresentedwhichintegrates implicit knowledge on the relevance of spatial context into classi›cation. Both approaches are promising as they obtain higher classi›cation accuracies when integrating external knowledge. The innovation of the contribution is that data fusion with a second source of data via kernel composition is combined with a modi›cation of the one-againstone cascade which allows integration of human

[1]  J. Weidong Selection of Kernel Functions and Parameters for Support Vector Machines in System Identification , 2006 .

[2]  Ramanathan Sugumaran,et al.  Seasonal Effect on Tree Species Classification in an Urban Environment Using Hyperspectral Data, LiDAR, and an Object-Oriented Approach , 2008, Sensors.

[3]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  MultiSpec: a tool for multispectral--hyperspectral image data analysis , 2002 .

[4]  D. Landgrebe On Information Extraction Principles for Hyperspectral Data , 1997 .

[5]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Fusion of Support Vector Machines for Classification of Multisensor Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Uwe Weidner,et al.  HYPERSPECTRAL MEETS LASERSCANNING: IMAGE ANALYSIS OF ROOF SURFACES , 2005 .

[9]  G. F. Hughes,et al.  On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Paul Honeine,et al.  The angular kernel in machine learning for hyperspectral data classification , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[11]  Uwe Weidner,et al.  Integrating external knowledge into SVM classification - Fusing hyperspectral and laserscanning data by kernel composition , 2012 .

[12]  J. Mercer Functions of positive and negative type, and their connection with the theory of integral equations , 1909 .

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  New Support Vector Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[14]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Evaluation of Kernels for Multiclass Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[15]  Christian Heipke,et al.  High Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial Information , 2012 .

[16]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[17]  Elisabetta Binaghi,et al.  Fuzzy contextual classification of multisource remote sensing images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  G. Mercier,et al.  Support vector machines for hyperspectral image classification with spectral-based kernels , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[19]  Dirk LEMP,et al.  Use of hyperspectral and laser scanning data for the characterization of surfaces in urban areas , 2004 .

[20]  José Luis Rojo-Álvarez,et al.  Kernel-Based Framework for Multitemporal and Multisource Remote Sensing Data Classification and Change Detection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery , 1995 .

[22]  B. Lees,et al.  Combining Non-Parametric Models for Multisource Predictive Forest Mapping , 2004 .

[23]  N. Coops,et al.  Assessing the utility of airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data for species distribution mapping in the coastal Pacific Northwest, Canada , 2010 .