Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization

Self-categorization theory (Turner, 1985; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987) explains group polarization as conformity to a polarized norem which defines one's own group in contrast to other groups within a specific social context. Whether the ingroup norm is polarized or not depends on the social comparative context within which the ingroup defines itself. It was predicted from self-categorization theory that an ingroup confronted by a risky outgroup will polarize toward caution, an ingroup confronted by a caution outgroup will polarize toward risk, and an ingroup in the middle of the social frame of reference, confronted by both risky and cautious outgroups, will not polarize but will converge on its pretest mean. Our experiment adopted a modified version of the risky-shift paradigm, in which subjects gave pretest, posttest, and group consensus recommendations on three choice dilemma item-types (risky, neutral, or risky). The frame of reference was manipulated by confronting the ingroup wi...

[1]  W. Doise Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments. , 1969 .

[2]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[3]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[5]  G. Stephenson,et al.  The effects of intergroup comparison on the polarization of opinions , 1981 .

[6]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[7]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[8]  D. Myers,et al.  Does Learning Others' Opinions Change One's Opinions? , 1980 .

[9]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[10]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[11]  M. Billig,et al.  Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization , 1971 .

[12]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[13]  D. G. Pruitt Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[14]  D. Mackie Social identification effects in group polarization. , 1986 .

[15]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion , 1978 .

[16]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization , 1977 .

[17]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[18]  John C. Turner,et al.  Referent informational influence and group polarization. , 1989 .

[19]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .

[20]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Depolarization of attitudes in groups. , 1978 .

[21]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Attitude polarization: Effects of group membership. , 1984 .

[22]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .