Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model

The aim of this study is to examine the factors that influenced the use of Facebook among university students. Using an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) with emotional attachment (EA) as an external variable, a sample of 498 students from a public-funded Thailand university were surveyed on their responses to five variables hypothesized to predict their actual use of Facebook. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling and the results showed that perceived usefulness (PU), attitude towards technology use (ATU), and EA had direct and significant influences on actual use, while perceived ease of use (PEU) was an indirect determinant of Facebook use. EA has direct and significant influences on all core variables in the TAM: PU; PEU; ATU; and actual use. Together, the PU, ATU, and EA explained 35.1% of the variance in students' usage of Facebook. Relatively, the variation in ATU and PU accounted by their determinants amounted to 55.5% and 50.2%, respectively.

[1]  Edward W. Boyer,et al.  Dissemination of Psychoactive Substance Information by Innovative Drug Users , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[4]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[5]  Merry J. Sleigh,et al.  Professors' Facebook Content Affects Students' Perceptions and Expectations , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Is there an attitude problem? Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Andy Keenan,et al.  Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites , 2009 .

[8]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .

[9]  K. Mardia.  Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications , 1970 .

[10]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology , 2007 .

[11]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  R. Mason.  Learning technologies for adult continuing education , 2006 .

[13]  D. Stallknecht.  FACT SHEET , 2006 .

[14]  Dianne M. Finkelstein,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2005, Technometrics.

[15]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. , 2011 .

[16]  Dan Costin,et al.  The Relationship Between Facebook and the Well-Being of Undergraduate College Students , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[18]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1 , 2007 .

[19]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior , 2012, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[20]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Why Do People Use Facebook? , 2012, Personality and individual differences.

[22]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[23]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices , 2005 .

[24]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Coefficient Alpha and Beyond: Issues and Alternatives for Educational Research , 2013 .

[25]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[26]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[28]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology , 2011 .

[29]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[30]  Timothy Teo.  Establishing Gender Structural Invariance of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2010 .

[31]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Students' and teachers' use of Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Timothy Teo,et al.  An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS) , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Yoonmo Sang,et al.  Exploring Koreans' smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[37]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Social integration and post-adoption usage of Social Network Sites An analysis of effects on learning performance , 2011 .

[38]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[39]  J. Hoelter.  The Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1983 .

[40]  Brett A. Bumgarner,et al.  You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults , 2007, First Monday.

[41]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  C. W. Park,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands , 2005 .

[43]  Timothy Teo,et al.  An Assessment of Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Acceptance in Turkey: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 2012 .

[44]  Xiaofeng Guo,et al.  Meeting the "Digital Natives": Understanding the Acceptance of Technology in Classrooms , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[45]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Understanding the Intention to Use Technology by Preservice Teachers: An Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Models , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  Mark R. Lehto,et al.  User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Yasemin Koçak Usluel,et al.  Modeling educational usage of Facebook , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Lisa McQuilken,et al.  A Novel Romance: The Technology Acceptance Model with Emotional Attachment , 2011 .

[51]  Mark-Shane Scale,et al.  Facebook as a social search engine and the implications for libraries in the twenty-first century , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[52]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[53]  Namkee Park,et al.  Adoption and Use of Computer-Based Voice Over Internet Protocol Phone Service: Toward an Integrated Model , 2010 .

[54]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[55]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Why Is Facebook So Successful? Psychophysiological Measures Describe a Core Flow State While Using Facebook , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[56]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Considering common method variance in educational technology research , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Hsiu-Li Liao,et al.  Issues in Information Systems , 2011 .