RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION IN PATIENTS WITH APHASIA: A TEST OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS

Randomization performance was studied using the "Mental Dice Task" in 20 patients with aphasia (APH) and 101 elderly normal control subjects (NC). The produced sequences were compared to 100 computer-generated pseudorandom sequences with respect to 7 measures of sequential bias. The performance of APH differed significantly from NC participants, according to all but one measure, i.e. Turning Point Index (points of change between ascending and descending sequences). NC participants differed significantly from the computer generated sequences, according to all measures of randomness,. Finally, APH differed significantly from the computer simulator, according to all measures but mean Repetition Gap score (gap between a digit and its reoccurrence). Despite the heterogeneity of our APH group, there were no significant differences in randomization performance between patients with different language impairments. All the APH displayed a distinct performance profile, with more response stereotypy, counting tendencies, and inhibition problems, as hypothesised, while at the same time responding more randomly than NC by showing less of a cycling strategy and more number repetitions.

[1]  P. Brugger.  Variables That Influence the Generation of Random Sequences: An Update , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  F. J. Evans,et al.  Monitoring attention deployment by random number generation: An index to measure subjective randomness , 1978 .

[3]  R. G Brown,et al.  Executive processes in Parkinsons disease—random number generation and response suppression , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  T. Robbins,et al.  Random Number Generation in Patients with Symptomatic and Presymptomatic Huntington's Disease , 2004, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[5]  A Baddeley,et al.  Random Generation and the Executive Control of Working Memory , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  X. Seron.  Number and language processing , 2001 .

[7]  Yoko Hoshi,et al.  Resting hypofrontality in schizophrenia: A study using near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy , 2006, Schizophrenia Research.

[8]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  The Effects of Total Sleep Deprivation on the Generation of Random Sequences of Key-Presses, Numbers and Nouns , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  R. Hazlewood,et al.  The effects of Parkinson's disease on the capacity to generate information randomly , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test , 2001, Memory.

[11]  Carl Ludy,et al.  Is problem solving dependent on language? , 2005, Brain and Language.

[12]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Language and number: a bilingual training study , 2001, Cognition.

[13]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  M. Taira,et al.  Random number generation evaluation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus indicates a heterogeneous nature of central nervous system vulnerability , 2006, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[15]  E. D. Haan,et al.  Random generation deficit in alcoholic Korsakoff patients , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  F Duval,et al.  Random number generation by normal, alcoholic and schizophrenic subjects , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[17]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Number words are special: Evidence from a case of primary progressive aphasia , 2006, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[18]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Semantic and phonemic sequence effects in random word generation: A dissociation between Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease patients , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[19]  A. Ellis,et al.  Why Do Some Aphasics Show an Advantage on Some Tests of Nonpropositional (Automatic) Speech? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[20]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Frontal lobes and language , 1989, Brain and Language.

[21]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[22]  J. Towse.  On random generation and the central executive of working memory. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[23]  P. Brugger,et al.  Random number generation in dementia of the Alzheimer type: A test of frontal executive functions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J B Poline,et al.  Working memory control in patients with schizophrenia: a PET study during a random number generation task. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[25]  N. helm-estabrooks.  Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[26]  Emmanuel Strypstein,et al.  Dual Task Performance after Severe Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury or Vascular Prefrontal Damage , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[27]  H. Merckelbach,et al.  The random number generation task: Psychometric properties and normative data of an executive function task in a mixed sample , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Number and language : how are they related ? , 2004 .

[29]  O. Bueno,et al.  Performance of university students on random number generation at different rates to evaluate executive functions. , 2004, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[30]  John N. Towse,et al.  Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance , 1998 .

[31]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Components of Random Generation by Normal Subjects and Patients with Dysexecutive Syndrome , 1993, Brain and Cognition.