Managing design variety, process variety and engineering change: a case study of two capital good firms

Many capital good firms deliver products that are not strictly one-off, but instead share a certain degree of similarity with other deliveries. In the delivery of the product, they aim to balance stability and variety in their product design and processes. The issue of engineering change plays an important in how they manage to do so. Our aim is to gain more understanding into how capital good firms manage engineering change, design variety and process variety, and into the role of the product delivery strategies they thereby use. Product delivery strategies are defined as the type of engineering work that is done independent of an order and the specification freedom the customer has in the remaining part of the design. Based on the within-case and cross-case analysis of two capital good firms several mechanisms for managing engineering change, design variety and process variety are distilled. It was found that there exist different ways of (1) managing generic design information, (2) isolating large engineering changes, (3) managing process variety, (4) designing and executing engineering change processes. Together with different product delivery strategies these mechanisms can be placed within an archetypes framework of engineering change management. On one side of the spectrum capital good firms operate according to open product delivery strategies, have some practices in place to investigate design reuse potential, isolate discontinuous engineering changes into the first deliveries of the product, employ ‘probe and learn’ process management principles in order to allow evolving insights to be accurately executed and have informal engineering change processes. On the other side of the spectrum capital good firms operate according to a closed product delivery strategy, focus on prevention of engineering changes based on design standards, need no isolation mechanisms for discontinuous engineering changes, have formal process management practices in place and make use of closed and formal engineering change procedures. The framework should help managers to (1) analyze existing configurations of product delivery strategies, product and process designs and engineering change management and (2) reconfigure any of these elements according to a ‘misfit’ derived from the framework. Since this is one of the few in-depth empirical studies into engineering change management in the capital good sector, our work adds to the understanding on the various ways in which engineering change can be dealt with.

[1]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development and Time Efficiency , 2005 .

[2]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[3]  Rob Dekkers,et al.  Engineering management and the Order Entry Point , 2006 .

[4]  Johannes T. Voordijk,et al.  A methodology for developing product platforms in the specific setting of the housebuilding industry , 2006 .

[5]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  An ethnographic study of design knowledge reuse in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2006 .

[6]  Hans Wortmann,et al.  Product platform life cycles: a multiple case study , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Reliability improvement through alternative designs - A case study , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Hiroyuki Chuma.  Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the microlithography industry: implications for science-based industries , 2006 .

[9]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  Mass customization: Literature review and research directions , 2001 .

[11]  Jwm Will Bertrand,et al.  Production control in engineer-to-order firms , 1993 .

[12]  Christian Hicks,et al.  Product life cycle management in engineer-to-order industries , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[13]  Dennis Muntslag,et al.  Managing customer order driven engineering : an interdisciplinary and design oriented approach , 1993 .

[14]  B. G. Dale.  The management of engineering change procedure , 1982 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Nagraj Balakrishnan,et al.  MANAGING ENGINEERING CHANGE: MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND MANUFACTURING COSTS , 1996 .

[17]  Alison McKay,et al.  Relating product definition and product variety , 1996 .

[18]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures , 2002 .

[19]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting change propagation in complex design , 2004 .

[20]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms , 1999 .

[21]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Hans Wortmann,et al.  Comparison of information systems for engineer-to-order and make-to-stock situations , 1995 .

[23]  Xingxing Zu,et al.  The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma , 2008 .

[24]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Strategic positioning of the order penetration point , 2003 .

[25]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Planning development processes for complex products , 2010 .

[26]  Joakim Wikner,et al.  Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point , 2005 .

[27]  Eitan Zemel,et al.  Managing Business Process Flows , 1999 .

[28]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing and improving commonality and diversity within a product family , 2009 .

[29]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs , 1995 .

[30]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Postponing design processes in unpredictable environments , 2004 .

[31]  H. Voordijk,et al.  Matching supply networks to a modular product architecture in the house-building industry , 2009 .

[32]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[33]  Bas Jeroen Oosterman,et al.  Improving product development projects by matching product architecture and organization , 2001 .

[34]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[35]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .

[36]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007 .

[37]  Hans Wortmann,et al.  Impact of product platforms on lean production systems: evidence from industrial machinery manufacturing , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[38]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[39]  E. Naveh.  FORMALITY AND DISCRETION IN SUCCESSFUL R&D PROJECTS. , 2003 .

[40]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[41]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the capital goods economy: complex product systems in the UK , 2004 .

[42]  Joakim Wikner,et al.  Mass customization in terms of the customer order decoupling point , 2004 .

[43]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems , 2009 .

[44]  Lee W. Schruben,et al.  External Change in Large Engineering Design Projects: The Role of the Client , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[45]  Pa Paul Konijnendijk.  Coordinating marketing and manufacturing in ETO companies , 1994 .

[46]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature , 2011 .

[47]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  The product-process-organisation relationship in complex development projects , 2000 .

[48]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  The process management triangle: An empirical investigation of process trade-offs , 2007 .

[49]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: capacity and congestion effects , 1999 .

[50]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[51]  Giovanna Vianello,et al.  ENGINEERING CHANGES DURING THE SERVICE PHASE , 2008 .

[52]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[53]  Jasper Veldman,et al.  Applicability of the capability maturity model for engineer-to-order firms , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[54]  M. Hobday.  Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[55]  David M. McCutcheon,et al.  Conducting case study research in operations management , 1993 .

[56]  William L. Berry,et al.  Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation , 2000 .

[57]  A. A. Alblas,et al.  Platform strategy for complex products and systems , 2011 .

[58]  Jc Johan Wortmann,et al.  Customer-driven manufacturing , 1996 .

[59]  Brian Rodrigues,et al.  A tree unification approach to constructing generic processes , 2009 .

[60]  M. Hobday.  The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[61]  Christopher Earl,et al.  Product and knowledge networks in engineer-to-order projects , 2000 .

[62]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Engineering changes and time delays: A field investigation , 1992 .

[63]  Benjamin S. Blanchard.  An enhanced approach for implementing total productive maintenance in the manufacturing environment , 1994 .

[64]  Hmh Herman Hegge,et al.  Generic bill-of-material: a new product model , 1991 .

[65]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[66]  M. Marcelli,et al.  Design and Methods , 2011 .

[67]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[69]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Process Platform Planning for Variety Coordination From Design to Production in Mass Customization Manufacturing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[70]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Product family modeling for mass customization , 1998 .

[71]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Engineering change: drivers, sources and approaches in industry , 2009 .

[72]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Environmental Volatility, Development Decisions, and Software Volatility: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[73]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Engineering change administration: the key issues , 1992 .

[74]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design process improvement : a review of current practice , 2005 .

[75]  S. Kotha.  Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[76]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change and customisation in complex engineering domains , 2004 .

[77]  Manuel E. Sosa.  A structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development , 2008 .

[78]  Christopher F. Earl,et al.  An analysis of company structure and business processes in the capital goods industry in the UK , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[79]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..