Changes in the self‐regulation guidelines of the US Beer Code reduce the number of content violations reported in TV advertisements

From a public health perspective, alcohol advertising should not be directed at vulnerable groups, nor should it portray excessive drinking or other objectionable content such as illegal activity. To promote the responsible advertising of alcoholic beverages, alcohol industry groups have developed self-regulation guidelines that describe which types of content (and exposure markets) are unacceptable. In 2006 the US Beer Institute revised the content guidelines of the 1997 Beer Code. This study was designed to determine whether these changes made the revised Code more or less likely for expert judges to report guideline violations, and for alcohol advertisements to include otherwise inappropriate content from a public health perspective. Six alcohol advertisements known or suspected to have multiple content violations were rated by 139 experts selected on the basis of their expertise in public health, mental health, alcohol research and marketing. The ads were rated on two occasions with feedback about other viewers' ratings provided at the second rating. The data were collected by means of a computer-based rating program that used multiple items to evaluate the eight major content guidelines of the US Beer Code. The ratings were scored according to both the 1997 and the 2006 versions of the Beer Code. According to the 1997 criteria, raters identified an average of 26 guideline violations across the six ads; the number of violations was reduced to 18 when the 2006 criteria were applied. The difference was statistically significant and was primarily attributable to changes in guidelines dealing with the portrayal of illegal activity, humorous situations and the act of drinking. By removing or revising commonly violated guidelines, the 2006 Beer Code revision permits portrayal of previously objectionable ad content and increases the likelihood that risky drinking behaviours will be portrayed in US beer advertisements. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  K. Pasch,et al.  Does outdoor alcohol advertising around elementary schools vary by the ethnicity of students in the school? , 2009, Ethnicity and Health.

[2]  T. Babor,et al.  Reliability of a rating procedure to monitor industry self-regulation codes governing alcohol advertising content. , 2008, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[3]  N. O. Kwate Take one down, pass it around, 98 alcohol ads on the wall: outdoor advertising in New York city's black neighbourhoods. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  P. Howat,et al.  Magazine alcohol advertising compliance with the Australian Alcoholic Beverages Advertising Code. , 2007, Drug and alcohol review.

[5]  M. Slater,et al.  Effects of alcohol advertising exposure on drinking among youth. , 2006, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[6]  Ralph Hingson,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001. , 2005, Annual review of public health.

[7]  T. Babor,et al.  Effects of cautionary messages and vulnerability factors on viewers' perceptions of alcohol advertisements. , 2005, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Study habits and the level of alcohol use among college students , 2004 .

[9]  P. Rathouz,et al.  Alcohol advertising in magazines and adolescent readership. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  Sandra C. Jones,et al.  Self-regulation of alcohol advertising: Is it working for Australia? , 2002 .

[11]  Marc A Schuckit,et al.  Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[12]  A. Treno,et al.  Alcohol Advertising and Youth: A Focus-Group Analysis of What Young People Find Appealing in Alcohol Advertising , 2001 .

[13]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. , 2000, Journal of health economics.

[14]  J. Wallace,et al.  Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhood. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[15]  H. Wechsler,et al.  College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[16]  W. DeJong,et al.  Does Cigarette Print Advertising Adhere to the Tobacco Institute's Voluntary Advertising and Promotion Code? An Assessment , 1998, Journal of public health policy.

[17]  M. Alaniz Alcohol Availability and Targeted Advertising in Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities , 1998, Alcohol health and research world.

[18]  D. Hackbarth,et al.  Tobacco and Alcohol Billboards in 50 Chicago Neighborhoods: Market Segmentation to Sell Dangerous Products to the Poor , 1995, Journal of public health policy.

[19]  Deborah K. Owen,et al.  The Role of Empirical Evidence in the Federal Regulation of Advertising , 1991 .

[20]  L. Wallack,et al.  Government Regulation of Alcohol Advertising: Protecting Industry Profits versus Promoting the Public Health , 1981, Journal of public health policy.