Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis

This article reports a meta-analysis of 82 studies assessing the relationship between social value orientation (SVO) and cooperation in social dilemmas. A significant and small to medium effect size was found (r = .30). Results supported a hypothesis that the effect size was larger when participants were not paid (r = .39) than when they were paid (r = .23). The effect size was also larger in give-some (r = .29) as opposed to take-some (r = .22) games. However, contrary to expectations, the effect was not larger in one-shot, as opposed to iterated games. Findings are discussed in the context of theory on SVO and directions for future research are outlined.

[1]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[2]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[3]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  D. Magnusson,et al.  Personality at the crossroads : current issues in interactional psychology , 1977 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[6]  R. Orwin.  A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[7]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[8]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effects of social motives on behavior in social dilemmas in two cultures. , 1985 .

[9]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis , 1986 .

[10]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  Value Orientation and Conformity , 1986 .

[11]  D. Messick,et al.  Might over Morality : Social Values and the Perception of Other Players in Experimental Games , 1986 .

[12]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: a transformational analysis , 1988 .

[13]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-Person Prisoner's Dilemmas , 1988 .

[14]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give‐some dilemma , 1989 .

[15]  W. Liebrand,et al.  The Influence of Other's Morality and Own Social Value Orientation on Cooperation in the Netherlands and the U.S.A. , 1991 .

[16]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle , 1991 .

[17]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Might versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives , 1991 .

[18]  P. Lange.  Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis , 1992 .

[19]  Sylvia G. Roch,et al.  Effects of environmental uncertainty and Social value orientation in resource dilemmas , 1997 .

[20]  C. Parks,et al.  The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods Games , 1994 .

[21]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .

[22]  The effect of self-presentation on social value orientation. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[23]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: a comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas , 1995 .

[24]  J. Sell,et al.  Effects of information and motivational orientation on harvest of a declining renewable resource , 1995 .

[25]  P. Healy,et al.  Learning the lessons. , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[26]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[27]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods. , 1996 .

[28]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Social ties in a public good experiment , 1997 .

[29]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Gain–loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. , 1997 .

[30]  D. Budescu,et al.  Effects of Protocol of Play and Social Orientation on Behavior in Sequential Resource Dilemmas , 1997 .

[31]  A. Semin-Goossens,et al.  The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation , 1998 .

[32]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[33]  Kennon M. Sheldon.  Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat : Even competitors can get the message , 1999 .

[34]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[35]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Locomotion in social dilemmas: How we adapt to cooperative, Tit-For-Tat, and noncooperative partners. , 1999 .

[36]  D. Messick,et al.  Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[37]  T. Gärling.  Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas , 1999 .

[38]  D. Cremer.  Leadership selection in social dilemmas--Not all prefer it: The moderating effect of social value orientation. , 2000 .

[39]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[40]  L. Hulbert,et al.  Cooperation in social dilemmas and allocentrism: a social values approach , 2001 .

[41]  M. Perugini,et al.  Individual differences and social norms: the distinction between reciprocators and prosocials , 2001 .

[42]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity , 2001 .

[43]  C. Parks,et al.  Elements of Reciprocity and Social Value Orientation , 2001 .

[44]  Exploring the role of consistency of social value orientations : temporal stability, reciprocal cooperation, and forgiveness , 2002 .

[45]  D. Cremer,et al.  Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: a test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas , 2002 .

[46]  Peter Loukopoulos,et al.  Spill-over effects of intermittent costs for defection in social dilemmas , 2002 .

[47]  C. Parks,et al.  Mixed-motive conflict in social dilemmas: Mood as input to competitive and cooperative goals , 2003 .

[48]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  Do not prime hawks with doves: the interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  S. Utz,et al.  What is smart in a social dilemma? differential effects of priming competence on cooperation , 2004 .

[50]  L. Ross,et al.  The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[51]  Jessica Y.Y. Kwong,et al.  Measurements and Effects of Social-Value Orientation in Social Dilemmas: A Review. , 2004 .

[52]  Sonja Utz.  Self-activation is a two-edged sword: The effects of I primes on cooperation , 2004 .

[53]  Brent Simpson,et al.  Social Values, Subjective Transformations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2004 .

[54]  David De Cremer,et al.  All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation , 2005 .

[55]  T. Gärling,et al.  Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[56]  David De Cremer,et al.  Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource size uncertainty , 2006 .

[57]  Are Prosocials Unique in Their Egalitarianism? The Pursuit of Equality in Outcomes Among Individualists , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[58]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[59]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[60]  Stefan Pickl,et al.  The Influence of Social Values in Cooperation , 2007, OR.

[61]  David De Cremer,et al.  Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. , 2007 .

[62]  Wernher M. Brucks,et al.  When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[63]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt , 2007 .

[64]  Is Indirect Reciprocity Undermined by Noise in Social Dilemmas? A Psychological Approach to Reputation , 2007 .

[65]  Rob M. A. Nelissen,et al.  How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game , 2007 .

[66]  M. Ferguson.  On the automatic evaluation of end-states. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Christophe Boone,et al.  Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[68]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[70]  C. Parks,et al.  The environmentalist who cried drought: Reactions to repeated warnings about depleting resources under conditions of uncertainty , 2009 .

[71]  M. Withey,et al.  The Strong Situation Hypothesis , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.