QoS performance analysis of bit rate video streaming in next generation networks using TCP, UDP and a TCP+UDP hybrid

The growth in users streaming videos on the Internet has led to increased demand for improved video quality and reception. In next generation networks (NGNs), such as 3G and 4G LTE, quality of service (QoS) implementation is one of the ways in which good video quality and good video reception can be achieved. QoS mainly involves following an industry-wide set of standard metrics and mechanisms to achieve high-quality network performance in respect of video streaming. Adopting routing and communication protocols is one way QoS is implemented in NGNs. This article describes QoS of bit rate video streaming, and QoS performance analysis of video streaming, in relation to the main network transport protocols, namely transmission control protocol (TCP) and user datagram protocol (UDP). A simulation test bed was set up using OPNET modeller 14.5. In this setup, a network topology was created and duplicated three times, in order to configure two simulation scenarios (each using the distinct protocols), and a third simulation scenario using both protocols in hybrid form. The findings in the simulations indicated that, when a network is configured with both TCP and UDP protocols in video streaming, there is a positive change in the degree of performance in terms of the QoS of videostreaming applications, unlike when the protocols are used independently.

[1]  nbspMs. Shruti M Shah,et al.  Enhance ADOV Routing Protocol in TCP and CBR Traffic , 2014 .

[2]  Rocky K. C. Chang,et al.  Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming , 2011, 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops.

[3]  Sen-Ching S. Cheung,et al.  Video Streaming with Network Coding , 2010, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[4]  Thomas Stockhammer,et al.  Adaptive video streaming over a mobile network with TCP-friendly rate control , 2009, IWCMC.

[5]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service , 2010, IEEE Network.

[6]  Ram Ramanathan,et al.  Challenges: a radically new architecture for next generation mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[7]  Min Chen,et al.  AMVSC: A framework of adaptive mobile video streaming in the cloud , 2012, GLOBECOM.

[8]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Adaptive stereoscopic 3D video streaming , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Guang Ji,et al.  VBR Video Streaming over Wireless Networks , 2010 .

[10]  Mathias Wien,et al.  Towards robust video streaming for unicast and multicast: Modeling and implementation , 2011, 2011 17th IEEE International Conference on Networks.

[11]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Quality of experience-driven adaptation scheme for video applications over wireless networks , 2010, IET Commun..

[12]  Tobias Hoßfeld,et al.  QoE of YouTube Video Streaming for Current Internet Transport Protocols , 2014, MMB/DFT.

[13]  Jens B. Schmitt,et al.  Measurement, Modelling, and Evaluation of Computing Systems and Dependability and Fault Tolerance , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Paulo Pedreiras,et al.  Online QoS Management for Multimedia Real-Time Transmission in Industrial Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Seong-Choon Lee,et al.  Toward enhanced mobile video services over WiMAX and LTE [WiMAX/LTE Update] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Sasan Adibi,et al.  Quality of Service Architectures for Wireless Networks: Performance Metrics and Management , 2010 .

[17]  Nisar Ahmed Memon,et al.  Evaluation of video streaming performance over peer-to-peer network , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[18]  Chih-Heng Ke,et al.  The Packet Loss Effect on MPEG Video Transmission in Wireless Networks , 2006, 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Volume 1 (AINA'06).

[19]  Mohamed Hefeeda,et al.  Dynamic Control of Receiver Buffers in Mobile Video Streaming Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[20]  Luca De Cicco,et al.  Feedback control for adaptive live video streaming , 2011, MMSys.

[21]  Sachin Katti,et al.  FlexCast: graceful wireless video streaming , 2011, MobiCom.

[22]  Jill M. Boyce,et al.  An improved UDP protocol for video transmission over Internet-to-wireless networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[23]  S. Selvakumar,et al.  Multi-constraint Qos Unicast Routing Using Genetic Algorithm (MURUGA) , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  R. Asokan A review of Quality of Service (QoS) routing protocols for mobile Ad hoc networks , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Computing (ICWCSC).

[25]  Ce-Kuen Shieh,et al.  Multi-path transmission control scheme combining bandwidth aggregation and packet scheduling for real-time streaming in multi-path environment , 2010, IET Commun..

[26]  Song Guo,et al.  Maximizing Multicast Communication Lifetime in Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[27]  Cheng-Hsin Hsu,et al.  Distortion-Aware Scalable Video Streaming to Multinetwork Clients , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[28]  István Oláh,et al.  Enhancing wireless video streaming using lightweight approximate authentication , 2008, Multimedia Systems.

[29]  Keith Knightson,et al.  NGN architecture: generic principles, functional architecture, and implementation , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[30]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  The Ant Colony Optimization Metaheuristic: Algorithms, Applications, and Advances , 2003 .

[31]  Thomas Plagemann,et al.  Challenges and techniques for video streaming over mobile ad hoc networks , 2010, Multimedia Systems.