Normal Fetal Posterior Fossa in MR Imaging: New Biometric Data and Possible Clinical Significance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Posterior fossa malformations are a common finding in prenatal diagnosis. The objectives of this study are to re-evaluate existing normal MR imaging biometric data of the fetal posterior fossa, suggest and evaluate new parameters, and demonstrate the possible clinical applications of these data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 215 fetal MR imaging examinations with normal findings and 5 examinations of fetuses with a suspected pathologic posterior fossa. Six previously reported parameters and 8 new parameters were measured. Three new parameter ratios were calculated. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: For measuring each structure, 151–211 MR imaging examinations were selected, resulting in a normal biometry curve according to gestational age for each parameter. Analysis of the ratio parameters showed that vermian lobe ratio and cerebellar hemisphere ratio remain constant with gestational age and that the vermis-to-cisterna magna ratio varies with gestational age. Measurements of the 5 pathologic fetuses are presented on the normal curves. Interobserver agreement was excellent, with the intraclass correlation coefficients of most parameters above 0.9 and only 2 parameters below 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: The biometry curves derived from new and existing biometric data and presented in this study may expand and deepen the biometry we use today, while keeping it simple and repeatable. By applying these extensive biometric data on suspected abnormal cases, diagnoses may be confirmed, better classified, or completely altered.

[1]  C. Garel,et al.  Fetal cerebral imaging – ultrasound vs. MRI: an update , 2013, Acta radiologica.

[2]  Richard N Brown Reassessment of the Normal Fetal Cisterna Magna during Gestation and an Alternative Approach to the Definition of Cisterna Magna Dilatation , 2013, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[3]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Multidimensional Analysis of Fetal Posterior Fossa in Health and Disease , 2013, The Cerebellum.

[4]  D. Lev,et al.  The Fetal vermis, pons and brainstem: normal longitudinal development as shown by dedicated neurosonography , 2013, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  E. Sivan,et al.  Diffusion MRI Findings in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies after Intrauterine Fetal Death , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  Julia A. Scott,et al.  3D Morphometric Analysis of Human Fetal Cerebellar Development , 2012, The Cerebellum.

[7]  G. Rembouskos,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  I. Sarris,et al.  A review of fetal volumetry: the need for standardization and definitions in measurement methodology , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  R. Achiron,et al.  Vermian Biometric Parameters in the Normal and Abnormal Fetal Posterior Fossa , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  C. Garel Posterior fossa malformations: main features and limits in prenatal diagnosis , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  D. Lev,et al.  The fetal cerebellum. Pitfalls in diagnosis and management , 2009, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  D. Cabrol,et al.  Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  C. Barnewolt,et al.  How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  C. Garel,et al.  Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and fetopathology in the evaluation of fetal posterior fossa non‐cystic abnormalities , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  K. Hecher,et al.  Fetal brain volume measurements by magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  V. des Portes,et al.  Plea for an anatomical approach to abnormalities of the posterior fossa in prenatal diagnosis , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  C. Barnewolt,et al.  Diagnosis of inferior vermian hypoplasia by fetal magnetic resonance imaging: potential pitfalls and neurodevelopmental outcome. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  E Borghi,et al.  Construction of the World Health Organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Andrea Righini,et al.  MRI of fetal and neonatal cerebellar development. , 2005, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[20]  R. Rigby,et al.  Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape , 2005 .

[21]  C. Garel,et al.  Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size , 2005, European Radiology.

[22]  C. Adamsbaum,et al.  MRI of the fetal posterior fossa , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[23]  Y. Zalel,et al.  Development of the human fetal pons: in utero ultrasonographic study , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  L. Guibaud Practical approach to prenatal posterior fossa abnormalities using MRI , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[25]  D. Lev,et al.  Is fetal magnetic resonance imaging superior to neurosonography for detection of brain anomalies? , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  A James Barkovich,et al.  Analysis and classification of cerebellar malformations. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[27]  D. Seidman,et al.  The development of the fetal vermis: an in‐utero sonographic evaluation , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[28]  Y. Zalel,et al.  The development of the fetal penis—an in utero sonographic evaluation , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  A. Rossi,et al.  Cystic malformations of the posterior cranial fossa originating from a defect of the posterior membranous area , 1996, Child's Nervous System.

[30]  T. Naidich,et al.  Posterior fossa malformations. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[31]  R. Filly,et al.  The fetal cisterna magna. , 1984, Radiology.

[32]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.