Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence

Police crackdowns are sudden increases in officer presence, sanctions, and threats of apprehension either for specific offenses or for all offenses in specific places. Of eighteen case studies of crackdowns, fifteen appeared to demonstrate initial deterrent effects, including two examples of long-term effects. In most long-term crackdowns with apparent initial deterrence, however, the effects began to decay after a short period, sometimes despite continued dosage of police presence or even increased dosage of police sanctions. However, five studies with postcrackdown data showed a "free bonus" of continued deterrence well after the crackdowns ended. Such "residual" deterrent effects lasted in two cases for a longer period than the crackdown itself. These findings of initial decay and residual deterrence suggest that crackdowns might be more effective if they were limited in duration and rotated across different targets. While such a policy raises certain ethical and legal questions, these should not preclude a program of experimental research to establish the residual deterrent effects of short crackdowns across a range of police tactics, offense types, and places.

[1]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[2]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[3]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Drug Use and Drug Programs in the Washington Metropolitan Area , 1988 .

[4]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Deterrent Effects of the Police on Crime: A Replication and Theoretical Extension , 1988 .

[5]  R. Clarke,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CRIME DISPLACEMENT: AN APPLICATION OF RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY , 1987 .

[6]  A. Blumstein Criminal careers and "career criminals" , 1986 .

[7]  W. Skogan Reducing Fear of Crime in Houston and Newark , 1986 .

[8]  Gary S. Green,et al.  GENERAL DETERRENCE AND TELEVISION CABLE CRIME: A FIELD EXPERIMENT IN SOCIAL CONTROL* , 1985 .

[9]  D. H. Peterson,et al.  Autobiography , 1985, Steroids.

[10]  H. Ross,et al.  Deterring the Drinking Driver: Legal Policy and Social Control. , 1983 .

[11]  R. Hyman Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .

[12]  J. Wilson,et al.  BROKEN WINDOWS: THE POLICE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SAFETY , 1982 .

[13]  R. McCleary,et al.  Deterrence of Drinking and Driving in France - An Evaluation of the Law of July 12, 1978 , 1981 .

[14]  P M Hurst,et al.  Deterrence at last. The ministry of transport's alcohol blitzes , 1981 .

[15]  B. Risman The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment , 1980 .

[16]  Eli B. Silverman,et al.  Scandal and Reform: Controlling Police Corruption , 1979 .

[17]  J. Schnelle,et al.  Patrol evaluation research: a multiple-baseline analysis of saturation police patrolling during day and night hours. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Policing a Free Society. , 1977 .

[19]  What's Known About Deterrent Effects of Police Activities. , 1976 .

[20]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  WHAT HAPPENED TO PATROL OPERATIONS IN KANSAS CITY? A REVIEW OF THE KANSAS CITY PREVENTIVE PATROL EXPERIMENT' , 1975 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  Jan M. Chaiken,et al.  The Impact of Police Activity on Subway Crime , 1974 .

[23]  H. Ross Law, Science, and Accidents: The British Road Safety Act of 1967 , 1973, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[24]  Gordon Hawkins,et al.  The Honest Politician's Guide to Crime Control , 1971 .

[25]  W. Westley,et al.  Violence and the Police , 1953, American Journal of Sociology.