ICT-enabled public sector organisational transformation: Factors constituting resistance to change

This paper suggests a revision of the commonly used model of acceptance of technical tools TAM for analyzing employees' attitudes towards ICT-enabled public sector organizational transformation. TAM models focus too much on technology acceptance ignoring employees' resistance to change and the reasons for innovation failure. Empirical research has shown the importance to consider these factors in organizational change projects. Basing on the example of the implementation of an electronic record system in the state Land Brandenburg Germany, the paper applies a quantitative methodology for addressing the question: To what extent can other factors, besides software-problems, explain the employees' resistance to change towards the implementation of the electronic record system? The results of our analysis show that in addition to the construct 'technology acceptance model' the variables: fear of losing work autonomy or in other words discretion, the perceived quality of information and the social influence significantly affect resistance to change. Long term analysis of the introduction of electronic systems in public organizations would improve the explanation power of our model enabling to examine the particular importance of these factors in different phases of the innovation process and to create appropriate interventions.

[1]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  SOCIAL INFORMATION AND EMPLOYEE ANXIETY ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 1985 .

[2]  Angelo J. Kinicki,et al.  Employee coping with organizational change: An examination of alternative theoretical perspectives and models. , 2008 .

[3]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  Nerina L Jimmieson,et al.  A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. , 2004, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[5]  D. Rousseau,et al.  On the Receiving End , 2006 .

[6]  A. Denisi,et al.  Communication with Employees Following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1991 .

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[8]  M. Sverke,et al.  The moderating role of personality characteristics on the relationship between job insecurity and strain , 2005 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[10]  P. Bordia,et al.  Job uncertainty and personal control during downsizing: A comparison of survivors and victims , 2005 .

[11]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[12]  David J. Stanley,et al.  Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational Change , 2005 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[14]  Harry S. Shannon,et al.  Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates , 2002 .

[15]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change , 2011 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[17]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[18]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[19]  Angelo J. Kinicki,et al.  Coping with an organizational merger over four stages. , 2002 .

[20]  S. Oreg Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change , 2006 .

[21]  Angela J. Martin,et al.  The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change , 2005 .

[22]  Deborah E. Gibbons,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE AND INNOVATION AMBIGUITY EFFECTS ON DIFFUSION IN DYNAMIC ORGANIZATIONAL FIELDS , 2004 .

[23]  L. Eby,et al.  Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change: Factors Related to Employees' Reactions to the Implementation of Team-Based Selling , 2000 .

[24]  Mark A Griffin,et al.  Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[26]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Connie R. Wanberg,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Marlene E. Burkhardt,et al.  SOCIAL INTERACTION EFFECTS FOLLOWING A TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION , 1994 .