Appropriate activation threshold of the external blind for visual comfort and lighting energy saving in different climate conditions

Abstract A blind control method is important to reduce energy consumption and to provide comfort to the occupants. The objective of this research is to suggest how to determine the appropriate activation threshold and the slat angle of the external venetian blind for different situations. The variables are the climate condition, building orientation, WWR and control purpose (weighting factor). We used the Koppen-Geiger climate classification, and four regions including Singapore (A), Phoenix (B), Hamburg (C) and Inchon (D) were selected. The performance of the blind was evaluated based on the DGI (daylight glare index) and lighting energy demand [kWh]. The weighting factor was applied to each element according to its importance. The main conclusions are as follows: if we focused on the comfort factor, the slat angle of the blind is larger. If the load factor is more important, greater threshold irradiance is better. In the regions with a high irradiance level, the slat angle is larger than that in the other regions, and this tendency is pronounced in the south orientation. In addition to this, if the load factor is three times more important than the comfort factor, the result of evb_no (no blind) shows the best performance, especially in Singapore and Phoenix with a high irradiance level.

[1]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  Occupant control of passive systems: the use of Venetian blinds , 2001 .

[2]  T. McMahon,et al.  Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2007 .

[3]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  Effect of humidity on human comfort and productivity after step changes from warm and humid environment , 2007 .

[4]  Ludovic Favre,et al.  Convergence of Multi-Criteria Optimization of a Building Energetic Resources by Genetic Algorithm , 2018 .

[5]  G. R. Newsham Manual Control of Window Blinds and Electric Lighting: Implications for Comfort and Energy Consumption , 1994 .

[6]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Review on visual comfort in office buildings and influence of daylight in productivity , 2008 .

[7]  Gillian Isoardi,et al.  Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings , 2014 .

[8]  Marie-Claude Dubois,et al.  Shading devices and daylight quality: an evaluation based on simple performance indicators , 2003 .

[9]  Kang Soo Kim,et al.  The influence of shading control strategies on the visual comfort and energy demand of office buildings , 2014 .

[10]  P. Torcellini,et al.  A Literature Review of the Effects of Natural Light on Building Occupants , 2002 .

[11]  Andrea Gasparella,et al.  Internal Versus External Shading Devices Performance in Office Buildings , 2014 .

[12]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  Glare from daylighting in buildings. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  The design and evaluation of integrated envelope and lighting control strategies for commercial buildings , 1995 .

[14]  Sandra Mende,et al.  CLIMATE BASED SIMULATION OF DIFFERENT SHADING DEVICE SYSTEMS FOR COMFORT AND ENERGY DEMAND , 2011 .

[15]  Edward Arens,et al.  Air Quality and Thermal Comfort in Office Buildings: Results of a Large Indoor Environmental Quality Survey , 2006 .

[16]  P. Roelofsen The impact of office environments on employee performance: The design of the workplace as a strategy for productivity enhancement , 2002 .

[17]  A. Athienitis,et al.  The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand , 2007 .

[18]  Marc Fontoynont,et al.  The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: A pilot study , 2006 .

[19]  Jeff Haberl,et al.  Development of a New ASHRAE Protocol for Measuring and Reporting the On-Site Performance of Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings , 2006 .

[20]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds , 2003 .

[21]  Kj McCartney,et al.  THERMAL COMFORT AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2002 .

[22]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[23]  Eric Shen,et al.  Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies , 2014 .

[24]  Olatz Irulegi,et al.  Energy Performance of Buildings , 2016 .

[25]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds , 2004 .

[26]  Dave Cavalcanti,et al.  Closed Loop Integrated Lighting and Daylighting Control for Low Energy Buildings , 2010 .

[27]  Deo Prasad,et al.  Office design and productivity: a workplace comfort-performance evaluation , 2008 .

[28]  Takashi Akimoto,et al.  Thermal comfort and productivity - Evaluation of workplace environment in a task conditioned office , 2010 .

[29]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces , 2012 .

[30]  Toshie Iwata,et al.  Automated blind control based on glare prevention with dimmable light in open-plan offices , 2017 .

[31]  Jimin Kim,et al.  An optimization model for selecting the optimal green systems by considering the thermal comfort and energy consumption , 2016 .

[32]  Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg,et al.  Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: A literature review , 2012 .

[33]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance , 2013 .

[34]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Performance of a daylight-redirecting glass-shading system , 2011 .

[35]  Vorpat Inkarojrit,et al.  Balancing comfort: occupants' control of window blinds in private offices , 2005 .

[36]  L Roche Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system , 2002 .

[37]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection , 2013 .

[38]  Jian Yao,et al.  An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements , 2014 .