Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment

Environmental assessment and protection are important concerns in modern business. Consumers are interested in environmental protection. They avoid purchasing products from dirt-imaged companies even if their prices are much less than the ones produced by green-imaged companies. The green image is very important for business survivability in our global market. A business concern associated with the green image is how to attain corporate sustainability where companies can attain both economic success and pollution prevention in their operations. There is tradeoff between economic prosperity and environmental concern. To attain a high level of corporate sustainability, companies need to measure the current performance in terms of their operational and environmental achievements. This study proposes a use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for such assessment. The proposed DEA assessment provides corporate leaders and managers with not only the measure of corporate sustainability but also information regarding how to invest for technology innovation for abatement of undesirable outputs (e.g., CO2). As an application, this study utilizes the proposed approach to measure the corporate sustainability of petroleum firms in the United States. The petroleum industry is functionally separated into integrated and independent companies. The integrated companies, referred to as “Major”, have their large supply chains for both “upstream” (e.g., exploration, development and production of crude oil or natural gas) and “downstream” (e.g., oil tankers, refineries, storages and retails). Meanwhile, the independent companies focus upon the upstream function, but not the downstream, in their business operations. The empirical comparison between the two groups of petroleum firms identifies that the integrated companies outperform the independent companies because a large supply chain incorporated into the former group provides them with both a scale merit in their operations and an opportunity to obtain consumer's opinions on their business operations. Thus, the large supply chain system, covering business functions for upstream and downstream, enhances corporate sustainability in the U.S. petroleum industry. It is easily envisioned that the empirical findings discussed in this study are useful in preparing business strategy and industrial policy for the petroleum industry of not only the United States but also other nations involved in oil and gas production.

[1]  K. Lai,et al.  Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain , 2008 .

[2]  Oar,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) , 2014 .

[3]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies , 2007 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale with Strong Complementary Slackness Conditions in DEA Assessment: Japanese Corporate Effort on Environment Protection , 2012 .

[5]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: Performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[6]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm , 2010 .

[7]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[8]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls , 1986 .

[9]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A combined use of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) with Strong Complementary Slackness Condition and DEA-DA (Discriminant Analysis) , 2011, Appl. Math. Lett..

[10]  Dayna Simpson,et al.  Use of supply relationships to recycle secondary materials , 2010 .

[11]  C. Carter,et al.  Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation , 2000 .

[12]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Integrating Environment and Economy Through Ecological Modernisation , 2000, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[13]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment for corporate sustainability by resource utilization and technology innovation: DEA radial measurement on Japanese industrial sectors , 2014 .

[14]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[15]  Wendy L. Tate,et al.  CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS: A THEMATIC ANALYSIS RELATED TO SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2010 .

[16]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[17]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Radial and non-radial approaches for environmental assessment by Data Envelopment Analysis: Corporate sustainability and effective investment for technology innovation , 2014 .

[18]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[20]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  A New Strategy Framework for Coping with Turbulence , 1997 .

[21]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[22]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment , 2013 .

[23]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization) , 2012 .

[24]  K. Lai,et al.  Complementarities and alignment of information systems management and supply chain management , 2009 .

[25]  R. Handfield,et al.  The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes , 1998 .

[26]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. fossil fuel power plants: Radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environmental assessment , 2012 .

[27]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: Desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants , 2012 .

[28]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  Operational synergy in the US electric utility industry under an influence of deregulation policy: A linkage to financial performance and corporate value , 2011 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to Scale, Damages to Scale, Marginal Rate of Transformation and Rate of Substitution in DEA Environmental Assessment , 2012 .

[30]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Core business concentration vs. corporate diversification in the US electric utility industry: Synergy and deregulation effects , 2009 .

[31]  JORGE RIVERA,et al.  Institutional Pressures and Voluntary Environmental Behavior in Developing Countries: Evidence From the Costa Rican Hotel Industry , 2004 .

[32]  Paul G. Harris,et al.  Environmental Perspectives and Behavior in China , 2006 .

[33]  Yuji Ijiri,et al.  Accounting Essays by Professor William W. Cooper: Revisiting in Commemoration of His Ninety-Fifth Birthday , 2010 .

[34]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[35]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[36]  Gregory Theyel Customer and Supplier Relations for Environmental Performance , 2001 .

[37]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA Environmental Assessment on U.S. Industrial Sectors , 2014 .

[38]  Katsuya Tanaka,et al.  Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry : A directional distance function approach , 2007 .

[39]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[40]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[41]  P. Franses,et al.  Vertical Marketing Systems for Complex Products: A Triadic Perspective , 2004 .

[42]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[43]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling , 2002 .

[44]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[46]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: Strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms , 2012 .

[47]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[48]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A use of DEA-DA to measure importance of R&D expenditure in Japanese information technology industry , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment: Measurement of damages to scale with unified efficiency under managerial disposability or environmental efficiency , 2013 .

[50]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations , 2013 .

[51]  A. Revell,et al.  The ecological modernisation of SMEs in the UK’s construction industry , 2007 .

[52]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity , 2006 .

[53]  Kalyan Singhal,et al.  Opportunities for developing the science of operations and supply‐chain management , 2012 .

[54]  R. Klassen,et al.  EXTENDING GREEN PRACTICES ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE IMPACT OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM INTEGRATION , 2006 .

[55]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Can environmental investment and expenditure enhance financial performance of US electric utility firms under the clean air act amendment of 1990 , 2009 .

[56]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems , 2004 .

[57]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment: A comparative study between Japanese chemical and pharmaceutical firms , 2014 .

[58]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions , 2012 .

[59]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measurement of a linkage among environmental, operational, and financial performance in Japanese manufacturing firms: A use of Data Envelopment Analysis with strong complementary slackness condition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[61]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Investment strategy for sustainable society by development of regional economies and prevention of industrial pollutions in Japanese manufacturing sectors , 2014 .

[62]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  Environmental Supply Chain Innovation , 2001 .

[63]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: Methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models , 2012 .

[64]  T. Engelder,et al.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop? , 2011, Nature.

[65]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA-Discriminant Analysis (DA) , 2012 .

[66]  Ari Paloviita,et al.  Recognizing definitive stakeholders in corporate environmental management , 2010 .

[67]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries , 2014 .

[68]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training , 2010 .

[69]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[70]  J. Macknick,et al.  U. S. Energy Sector Vulnerabilities to Climate Change and Extreme Weather , 2013 .