Response time of magnetorheological fluids and magnetorheological valves under various flow conditions

In this study, the response times of magnetorheological fluids and magnetorheological fluid valves are studied under various flow configurations. Two types of valving geometries, annular flow and radial flow, are considered in the magnetorheological fluid valve designs. The transient pressure responses of magnetorheological fluid valves are evaluated using a diaphragm pump with a constant volume flow rate. The performance of each magnetorheological valve is characterized using a voltage step input as well as a current step input while recording the activation electric voltage/current, magnetic flux density, and pressure drop as a function of time. The variation of the response time of the magnetorheological valves under constant volume flow rate is experimentally investigated. The Maxwell model with a time constant is employed to describe the field-induced pressure behavior of magnetorheological fluid under a steady flow. The results demonstrate that the pressure response times of the magnetorheological fluid and the magnetorheological valves depend on the designs of the electric parameters and the valve geometry. Magnetorheological valves with annular flow geometry have a slower falling response time compared to their rising response time. Magnetorheological valves with radial flow geometry demonstrate faster pressure response times both in rising and in falling states.

[1]  S. Olutunde Oyadiji,et al.  The relative transient response of MR fluids subjected to magnetic fields under constant shear conditions , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[2]  Seung-bok Choi,et al.  Optimal design of magnetorheological valves via a finite element method considering control energy and a time constant , 2008 .

[3]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers , 2006 .

[4]  Mark R. Jolly,et al.  Indirect Measurements of Microstructure Development in Magnetorheological Fluids , 1999 .

[5]  A. Milecki,et al.  Investigation of Dynamic Properties and Control Method Influences on MR Fluid Dampers’ Performance , 2002 .

[6]  Changsheng Zhu THE RESPONSE TIME OF A ROTOR SYSTEM WITH A DISK-TYPE MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUID DAMPER , 2005 .

[7]  Claus Gabriel,et al.  Measurement modes of the response time of a magneto-rheological fluid (MRF) for changing magnetic flux density , 2007 .

[8]  Barkan M. Kavlicoglu,et al.  Response time and performance of a high-torque magneto-rheological fluid limited slip differential clutch , 2007 .

[9]  Guangqiang Yang LARGE-SCALE MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUID DAMPER FOR VIBRATION MITIGATION : MODELING , TESTING AND CONTROL A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy , 2001 .

[10]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Comparative Analysis of the Time Response of Electrorheological and Magnetorheological Dampers Using Nondimensional Parameters , 2002 .

[11]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  Chapter 14:Magnetorheological Materials and their Applications , 2007 .

[12]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  Investigating the magnetorheological effect at high flow velocities , 2006 .