Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers

[1]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[2]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[3]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems , 1980 .

[4]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[5]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  R. Daft.  Why I Recommended That Your Manuscript Be Rejected and What You Can Do about it , 1995 .

[8]  Allen S. Lee.  Reviewing a manuscript for publication , 1995 .

[9]  Louis R. Pondy.  The Reviewer as Defense Attorney , 1995 .

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[12]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Obligations and obfuscations in the review process , 2002 .

[13]  Dale J Benos,et al.  How to review a paper. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[14]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  The Legacy of LEO: Lessons Learned from an English Tea and Cake Company's Pioneering Efforts in Information Systems , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Editor's comments: looking for diamond cutters , 2005 .