Thermo-physical properties of heat-treatable steels in the temperature range relevant for hot-stamping applications

In many industrial processes, the resulting mechanical properties of produced steel parts are directly influenced by the thermo-physical properties, which affect the heat treatment significantly. The quality of application-oriented simulations is strongly dependent on the input quantities, which are often generated by regression analysis or simple extrapolations. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the influence of the thermo-physical properties on such a process simulation referring to the hot stamping. Hot stamping is an established process in the automotive industry to produce ultra-high strength parts. A typical material used for this application is the low-alloyed steel 22MnB5. The thermal conductivity of this steel was investigated referring to the temperature-dependent microstructural changes during the hot-stamping process, particularly the γ to α′ transformation. In terms of the dynamic measuring method, the specific heat capacity, the thermal expansion coefficient, the density and the thermal diffusivity for the different temperature-dependent microstructures of the steel 22MnB5 were determined. The thermal conductivity for the complete temperature range of the hot-stamping process was generated, referring to measured and extrapolated data. To account for the fast γ–α′ transformation kinetics, a novel characterization and extrapolation method was applied. The heat capacity and the thermal diffusivity have a major impact on the thermal conductivity compared to the subordinated influence of the density. The metastable austenitic condition (T ≥ 900 °C) was compared to the martensitic condition (T ≤ 400 °C). The dependent thermal conductivity is significantly dependent on the crystallographic orientation of the lattice. The face-centred cubic lattice (austenite) has referring to the body-centred cubic lattice (martensite), a proportionally low thermal conductivity. During the transformation from austenite to martensite, the development is not linear but based on complex interactions. The results reveal that the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity has to be considered for reliable process simulations.

[1]  Mats Oldenburg,et al.  Austenite decomposition during press hardening of a boron steel : Computer simulation and test , 2006 .

[2]  E. Astm.  Standard test method for thermal diffusivity of solids by the flash method , 1992 .

[3]  Mehmet Acet,et al.  Constitution and Magnetism of Iron and its Alloys , 2001 .

[4]  Manabu Takahashi,et al.  Development of High Strength Steels for Automobiles , 2003 .

[5]  Wolfgang Bleck,et al.  Analysis of microstructure and mechanical properties of different high strength carbon steels after hot stamping , 2011 .

[6]  D. Yarbrough,et al.  Effect of point defects on the phonon thermal conductivity of bcc iron , 1987 .

[7]  Ctirad Uher,et al.  Thermal Conductivity of Metals , 2004 .

[8]  Marion Merklein,et al.  Investigation of the thermo-mechanical properties of hot stamping steels , 2006 .

[9]  E. Kaschnitz,et al.  Thermal Diffusivity of the Aluminum Alloy Al–17Si–4Cu (A390) in the Solid and Liquid States , 2007 .

[10]  Z. Xing,et al.  Numerical simulation of hot stamping of quenchable boron steel , 2009 .

[11]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1952 .

[12]  A. Tekkaya,et al.  A review on hot stamping , 2010 .

[13]  Eren Billur,et al.  Hot Stamping a B-Pillar with Tailored Properties: Experiments and Preliminary Simulation Results , 2013 .

[14]  B. Johansson,et al.  Electronic structure and effective chemical and magnetic exchange interactions in bcc Fe-Cr alloys , 2009 .

[15]  M. Geiger,et al.  Basic Investigations on the Hot Stamping Steel 22MnB5 , 2005 .

[16]  J B Patterson,et al.  Measurement of Absolute Water Density, 1 °C to 40 °C , 1994 .

[17]  A. Azushima,et al.  Development of tribo-simulator for hot stamping , 2010 .

[18]  B. Casas,et al.  Benefits from using high thermal conductivity tool steels in the hot forming of steels , 2010 .

[19]  Jihui Yang,et al.  Theory of Thermal Conductivity , 2004 .

[20]  N. Kojima,et al.  Effect of Quenching Rate on Hardness and Microstructure of Hot-Stamped Steel , 2013 .

[21]  R. A. Khairulin,et al.  Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity coefficients of 12Kh18N10T stainless steel in a wide temperature range , 2008 .

[22]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Sheet metal forming at elevated temperatures , 2006 .

[23]  Stefania Bruschi,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Plastic Anisotropy of the Quenchenable High Strength Steel 22MnB5 at Elevated Temperatures , 2007 .

[24]  W. Bleck,et al.  Hot Stamping of Ultra High-Strength Steels , 2008 .

[25]  A. Cezairliyan,et al.  Specific heat of solids , 1988 .

[26]  F. Richter,et al.  Die spezifische Wärmekapazität von metallischen Werkstoffen. - II. Teil: Austenitische Stähle , 1984 .

[27]  A. Röttger,et al.  Phase formation at the interface between a boron alloyed steel substrate and an Al-rich coating , 2013 .

[28]  R. J. Jenkins,et al.  Flash Method of Determining Thermal Diffusivity, Heat Capacity, and Thermal Conductivity , 1961 .

[29]  F. Richter,et al.  Die wichtigsten physikalischen Eigenschaften von 52 Eisenwerkstoffen , 1973 .

[30]  Lawrence G. Rubin,et al.  Materials at Low Temperatures , 1984 .

[31]  T. Tritt.  Thermal Conductivity: Theory, Properties, and Applications , 2010 .

[32]  M. Worswick,et al.  Hot forming of boron steels using heated and cooled tooling for tailored properties , 2012 .

[33]  Terry M. Tritt,et al.  Measurement Techniques and Considerations for Determining Thermal Conductivity of Bulk Materials , 2004 .

[34]  Gg. Enke,et al.  Die wichtigsten physikalischen Eigenschaften von 52 Eisenwerkstoffen. F. Richter. Mitt. aus dem Forschungsinstitut der Mannesmann AG. Stahleisen‐Sonderber. 8 (1973). DIN A 4. 19 Seit. und 13 Abbild. Verlag Stahleisen mbH, Düsseldorf ‐22,– DM , 1974 .