Effects of measurement uncertainties of meteorological data on estimates of site water balance components

Summary Numerical water balance models are widely used in ecological and hydro sciences. However, their application is related to specific problems and uncertainties. The reliability of model prediction depends on (i) model concept, (ii) parameters, (iii) uncertainty of input data, and (iv) uncertainty of reference data. How model concept (i) and parameters (ii) effect the model’s performance is an often treated problem. However, the effects of (iii) and (iv) are typically ignored or only barely treated in context of regionalisation and generalisation. In this study, the actual measurement uncertainties of input and reference data are the main focus. Furthermore, the evaluation of model results is analysed with regard to uncertainties of reference data. A special feature is the use of evapotranspiration (measured via the eddy covariance) instead of runoff for evaluation of simulation results. It is shown that seemingly small uncertainties of measurements can create significant uncertainties in simulation results depending on the temporal scale of investigation. As an example, the uncertainty of measurements of daily global radiation sum up to an uncertainty of 250 MJ (equivalent to 100 mm) on an annual scale, which causes an uncertainty of 40 mm in simulated grass-reverence evapotranspiration. Summarised and generalised, the measurement uncertainties of all input data create an uncertainty on average of around 5% in the simulated annual evapotranspiration and of around 10% in the simulated annual seepage. However, the effects can be significantly higher in years with extreme events and can reach up to 15%. It is demonstrated that uncertainties of individual variables are not simply superposed but interact in a complex way. Thereby, it has become apparent that the effects of measurement uncertainties on model results are similar for complex and for simple models.

[1]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[2]  George Kuczera,et al.  Impact of runoff measurement error models on the quantification of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff models , 2009 .

[3]  Henry Lin,et al.  Hydropedology: Bridging Disciplines, Scales, and Data , 2003 .

[4]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  A decade of carbon, water and energy flux measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt , 2007 .

[5]  Jennifer C. Adam,et al.  Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias , 2003 .

[6]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology , 1998 .

[7]  Shenglian Guo,et al.  A two-parameter monthly water balance model and its application , 1999 .

[8]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  A novel approach in model-based mapping of soil water conditions at forest sites , 2009 .

[9]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates , 1979 .

[11]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[12]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error , 2004 .

[13]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations , 2011 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[15]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Parametrization of turbulent fluxes over inhomogeneous landscapes , 2008 .

[16]  András Bárdossy,et al.  Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments , 2006 .

[17]  C. Mooney,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation , 1997 .

[18]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation , 2004 .

[19]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE‐SHE code , 2002 .

[20]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Another Simple Method of Spectral Correction to Obtain Robust Eddy-Covariance Results , 2008 .

[21]  Dario Papale,et al.  Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis , 2012 .

[22]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[23]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences On the importance of appropriate precipitation gauge catch correction for hydrological modelling at mid to high latitudes , 2012 .

[24]  D. Guyon,et al.  Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modelling , 2005 .

[25]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[26]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology , 2000 .

[27]  Tao Pang.  An Introduction to Computational Physics - 2nd Edition , 2006 .

[28]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters , 2008 .

[29]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[30]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall‐runoff model calibration and discharge predictions , 2010 .

[31]  T. Foken,et al.  Evaporation and heat exchange of a body of water with the atmosphere in a shallow zone , 2006 .

[32]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Hydrological modelling in a changing world , 2011 .

[33]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations , 1998 .

[34]  George Burba,et al.  A brief practical guide to eddy covariance flux measurements: Principles and workflow examples for s , 2010 .

[35]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators , 2005 .

[36]  John Moncrieff,et al.  The propagation of errors in long‐term measurements of land‐atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water , 1996 .

[37]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[38]  T. Vesala,et al.  Quality control of CarboEurope flux data - Part I: Footprint analyses to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems , 2007 .

[39]  Maria A. Moreno,et al.  Assessing the impacts of precipitation bias on distributed hydrologic model calibration and prediction accuracy , 2012 .

[40]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Chapter 7: Uncertainty quantification , 2012 .

[41]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Walter Boughton,et al.  Catchment water balance modelling in Australia 1960-2004 , 2005 .

[43]  Kurt Binder,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics , 1992, Graduate Texts in Physics.

[44]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[45]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Temporal dynamics of model parameter sensitivity for computationally expensive models with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test , 2011 .

[46]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application , 2006 .

[47]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[48]  R. Moore,et al.  Accuracy of rainfall measurement for scales of hydrological interest , 2000 .

[49]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Analytical derivation of the Budyko curve based on rainfall characteristics and a simple evaporation model , 2009 .

[50]  P. Reichert,et al.  Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe Basin in China: Statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference , 2007 .

[51]  Luca G. Lanza,et al.  The impact of tipping‐bucket raingauge measurement errors on design rainfall for urban‐scale applications , 2005 .

[52]  V. Singh,et al.  Review on Regional Water Resources Assessment Models under Stationary and Changing Climate , 2004 .

[53]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory , 2006 .

[54]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Rainfall uncertainty in hydrological modelling: An evaluation of multiplicative error models , 2011 .

[55]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scaling in hydrology , 2001 .

[56]  Mark D. Semon,et al.  POSTUSE REVIEW: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1982 .

[57]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  FAO-56 Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evaporation from Soil and Application Extensions , 2005 .

[58]  George Kuczera,et al.  Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: Characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation , 2011 .

[59]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Sensitivity analysis based on regional splits and regression trees (SARS-RT) , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[60]  Jing Yang,et al.  Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[61]  George Kuczera,et al.  Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors , 2010 .

[62]  Thibault Mathevet,et al.  Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models , 2006 .

[63]  H. Schmid,et al.  A Simple Parameterisation for Flux Footprint Predictions , 2004 .

[64]  L. Phil Graham,et al.  On the scale problem in hydrological modelling , 1998 .

[65]  F. Anctil,et al.  Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model?. Part 2: Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling , 2005 .

[66]  Dimitri Solomatine,et al.  A novel approach to parameter uncertainty analysis of hydrological models using neural networks , 2009 .

[67]  L. Oudin,et al.  Estimating potential evapotranspiration without continuous daily data: possible errors and impact on water balance simulations , 2010 .

[68]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales , 2006 .

[69]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty , 2005 .

[70]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  Land use regulates carbon budgets in eastern Germany: From NEE to NBP , 2010 .

[71]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[72]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Looking for hydrologic laws , 1986 .

[73]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Pattern, Process and Function: Elements of a Unified Theory of Hydrology at the Catchment Scale , 2006 .

[74]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Soil water content measurements deliver reliable estimates of water fluxes: a comparative study in a beech and a spruce stand in the Tharandt forest (Saxony, Germany). , 2009 .

[75]  Johannes Cullmann,et al.  Towards a more representative parametrisation of hydrologic models via synthesizing the strengths of Particle Swarm Optimisation and Robust Parameter Estimation , 2011 .

[76]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[77]  Ming Li,et al.  Gauge based precipitation estimation and associated model and product uncertainties , 2012 .

[78]  Mario L. V. Martina,et al.  Preserving the dominant physical processes in a lumped hydrological model , 2011 .

[79]  Jacques Lavabre,et al.  Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models , 2001 .

[80]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models , 2004 .

[81]  K. Beven,et al.  Model Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation , 2006 .

[82]  L. Feyen,et al.  Assessing parameter, precipitation, and predictive uncertainty in a distributed hydrological model using sequential data assimilation with the particle filter , 2009 .

[83]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[84]  William J. Massman,et al.  Handbook of micrometeorology : a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis , 2004 .

[85]  F. Wimmer,et al.  Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem , 2006 .

[86]  D. Wilhite,et al.  Estimating potential evapotranspiration: the effect of random and systematic errors , 1989 .

[87]  Changsheng Li,et al.  Bi-criteria evaluation of the MIKE SHE model for a forested watershed on the South Carolina coastal plain , 2010 .

[88]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[89]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian total error analysis for hydrologic models: sensitivity to error models , 2007 .

[90]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Uncertainties on mean areal precipitation: assessment and impact on streamflow simulations , 2008 .

[91]  George Kuczera,et al.  Battling Hydrological Monsters: Insights into Numerical Approximations, Data Uncertainty and Structural Errors , 2011 .

[92]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Evaluation of Climate Input Biases and Water Balance Issues Using a Coupled Surface–Subsurface Model , 2011 .

[93]  George Kuczera,et al.  There are no hydrological monsters, just models and observations with large uncertainties! , 2010 .

[94]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty , 2006 .

[95]  András Bárdossy,et al.  The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: can failure stories contribute to hydrological science? , 2010 .

[96]  G. Wessolek,et al.  Hydro-pedotransfer functions (HPTFs) for predicting annual percolation rate on a regional scale , 2008 .

[97]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure , 2005 .