Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology

Recent research has revealed that evolution often occurs on contemporary timescales, often within decades. Contemporary evolution is associated with the same factors that are driving the current extinction crisis: habitat loss and degradation, overharvesting and exotic species. Thus, it is relevant to many conservation situations. First, habitat fragmentation might influence the potential of a population to adapt in response environmental degradation. Second, certain harvesting strategies can result in the evolution of life-history traits, ultimately resulting in negative impacts on harvestable yield. Third, the establishment of exotic species can be influenced by their adaptive potential and our ability to limit that potential. Furthermore, contemporary evolution is of concern for intensively managed species, because it might reduce their fitness in native habitats. Ultimately, contemporary evolution is influenced by complex interactions among population size, genetic variation, the strength of selection, and gene flow, making most management scenarios unique. In a world filled with contemporary evolution, conservation efforts that ignore its implications will be less efficient and perhaps even risk prone. Humans have become an evolutionary force of extraordinary influence [1], evidenced most obviously by an unprecedented extinction rate that is attributable to their activities [2]. Human activities are also associated with evolutionary changes that can occur within a few hundred years, otherwise known as CONTEMPORARY EVOLUTION (see Glossary) [3‐5].

[1]  G. L. Vinyard,et al.  Translocations and the Preservation of Allelic Diversity , 1996 .

[2]  P. Leberg Strategies for population reintroduction: effects of genetic variability on population growth and size , 1993 .

[3]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Evolution of Resistance to Bacillus Thuringiensis , 1994 .

[4]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[5]  F. Allendorf,et al.  The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines , 2001 .

[6]  A. Hendry,et al.  Estimating Natural Selection Acting on Stream‐Dwelling Atlantic Salmon: Implications for the Restoration of Extirpated Populations , 2003 .

[7]  R. Frankham,et al.  How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential? , 1998 .

[8]  E. G. Boulding,et al.  Genetic and demographic parameters determining population persistence after a discrete change in the environment , 2001, Heredity.

[9]  A. Hendry,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: THE PACE OF MODERN LIFE: MEASURING RATES OF CONTEMPORARY MICROEVOLUTION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  M. Lynch,et al.  The critical effective size for a genetically secure population , 1998 .

[11]  S. Palumbi The Evolution Explosion: How Humans Cause Rapid Evolutionary Change , 2001 .

[12]  L. A. Vøllestad,et al.  A century of life-history evolution in grayling , 2004, Genetica.

[13]  Genetic architecture of adaptive differentiation in evolving host races of the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma , 2001 .

[14]  R. Reisenbichler,et al.  Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations , 1999 .

[15]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  Population Ecology , 2020, Nature.

[16]  J. Endler Natural selection in the wild , 1987 .

[17]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Extinction by hybridization and introgression , 1996 .

[18]  M. Macnair Heavy metal tolerance in plants: A model evolutionary system. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  R. Huey,et al.  Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. , 2000, Science.

[20]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Conservation Genetics , 2019, Handbook of Statistical Genomics.

[21]  C. Primmer,et al.  Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Julie R. Etterson,et al.  Constraint to Adaptive Evolution in Response to Global Warming , 2001, Science.

[23]  T. Quinn,et al.  MIGRATORY COSTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EGG SIZE AND NUMBER IN INTRODUCED AND INDIGENOUS SALMON POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  B. Schmid,et al.  Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. , 1998, American journal of botany.

[25]  Edwin H. Lowe,et al.  Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species , 1998 .

[26]  J. Merilä,et al.  Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits , 2001 .

[27]  T. Brown,et al.  The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna , 1997 .

[29]  A. Hendry,et al.  The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process , 2004, Genetica.

[30]  J. Mallet,et al.  The evolution of insecticide resistance: Have the insects won? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  R L Pressey,et al.  Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary future , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Gross,et al.  Breeding Success of Hatchery and Wild Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch) in Competition. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  Richard Frankham,et al.  HOW CLOSELY CORRELATED ARE MOLECULAR AND QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF GENETIC VARIATION? A META-ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[34]  Á. Lagunes-Tejeda,et al.  The occurrence of resistance to pesticides in arthropods , 1981 .

[35]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Genetic shift in photoperiodic response correlated with global warming , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. McKay,et al.  Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits , 2002 .

[37]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Gene flow and the limits to natural selection , 2002 .

[38]  L Partridge,et al.  Limits to natural selection , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[39]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations , 2004, Genetica.

[40]  Craig A. Stockwell,et al.  ECOLOGICAL GENETICS AND THE TRANSLOCATION OF NATIVE FISHES: EMERGING EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES , 2002 .

[41]  S. Riechert,et al.  High gene flow levels lead to gamete wastage in a desert spider system , 2004, Genetica.

[42]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  WHEN DOES EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION PREVENT EXTINCTION? , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1997, Science.

[45]  T. Quinn,et al.  Evolution of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process. , 2001 .

[46]  C. K. Williams,et al.  Phenotypic adaptation and natural selection in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, in Australia , 1989 .

[47]  J. Ward,et al.  Strain Is atmospheric CO 2 a selective agent on model C 3 annuals ? , 2022 .

[48]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[49]  J. Conner,et al.  How strong is natural selection? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[51]  M. Pearl,et al.  Conservation for the twenty-first century , 1990 .

[52]  C. Lee RAPID AND REPEATED INVASIONS OF FRESH WATER BY THE COPEPOD EURYTEMORA AFFINIS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  P. Hedrick Gene Flow and Genetic Restoration: The Florida Panther as a Case Study. , 1995, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[54]  D. Post,et al.  Lake ecosystems: Rapid evolution revealed by dormant eggs , 1999, Nature.

[55]  C. Moritz Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  P. Gingerich Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process , 2004, Genetica.

[57]  Michael Lynch,et al.  A Quantitative-Genetic Perspective on Conservation Issues , 1996 .

[58]  H. Browman Application of evolutionary theory to fisheries science and stock assessment- management , 2000 .

[59]  E. Bone,et al.  Trends and rates of microevolution in plants , 2004, Genetica.

[60]  MIGRATORY COSTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EGG SIZE AND NUMBER IN INTRODUCED AND INDIGENOUS SALMON POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[61]  S. Weeks,et al.  Translocations and rapid evolutionary responses in recently established populations of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) , 1999 .

[62]  A. Hendry,et al.  The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. , 2001 .

[63]  H. Schramm,et al.  Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems , 1995 .

[64]  T. Quinn,et al.  Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. , 2000, Science.

[65]  B. Grant,et al.  Unpredictable Evolution in a 30-Year Study of Darwin's Finches , 2002, Science.

[66]  D. Conover Darwinian fishery science , 2000 .

[67]  Craig Moritz,et al.  Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[68]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Invasive species in a changing world , 2000 .

[69]  J. Ward,et al.  Is atmospheric CO2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals? , 2000, Oecologia.

[70]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution , 2004, Genetica.

[71]  M. Lynch,et al.  Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations , 2001, Conservation Genetics.

[72]  M. Ford Selection in Captivity during Supportive Breeding May Reduce Fitness in the Wild , 2002 .

[73]  D. Schluter,et al.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2000 .

[74]  J. Tufto Effects of Releasing Maladapted Individuals: A Demographic‐Evolutionary Model , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[75]  Gary K. Meffe,et al.  Principles of Conservation Biology , 1995 .

[76]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. , 2001 .

[77]  Stephan B. Munch,et al.  Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time Scales , 2002, Science.

[78]  M. Lynch,et al.  EVOLUTION AND EXTINCTION IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT: A QUANTITATIVE‐GENETIC ANALYSIS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[79]  G. García-Ramos,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY SPEED OF SPECIES INVASIONS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[80]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. , 2001 .

[81]  D. Reznick,et al.  The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution , 2004, Genetica.

[82]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[83]  Why the null matters: Statistical tests, random walks and evolution , 2001 .

[84]  R. Noss Beyond Kyoto: Forest Management in a Time of Rapid Climate Change , 2001 .