Categorization of Failures in Polymer Rapid Tools Used for Injection Molding

Background—Polymer rapid tooling (PRT) inserts for injection molding (IM) are a cost-effective method for prototyping and low-volume manufacturing. However, PRT inserts lack the robustness of steel inserts, leading to progressive deterioration and failure. This causes quality issues and reduced part numbers. Approach—Case studies were performed on PRT inserts, and different failures were observed over the life of the tool. Parts molded from the tool were examined to further understand the failures, and root causes were identified. Findings—Critical parameters affecting the tool life, and the effect of these parameters on different areas of tool are identified. A categorization of the different failure modes and the underlying mechanisms are presented. The main failure modes are: surface deterioration; surface scalding; avulsion; shear failure; bending failure; edge failure. The failure modes influence each other, and they may be connected in cascade sequences. Originality—The original contributions of this work are the identification of the failure modes and their relationships with the root causes. Suggestions are given for prolonging tool life via design practices and molding parameters.

[1]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Additive manufacturing’s impact and future in the aviation industry , 2016 .

[2]  Joseph T. Belter,et al.  Strengthening of 3D Printed Fused Deposition Manufactured Parts Using the Fill Compositing Technique , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Byung-Ohk Rhee,et al.  A study on the estimation of plastic deformation of metal insert parts in multi-cavity injection molding by injection-structural coupled analysis , 2016 .

[4]  Prasad K. D. V. Yarlagadda *,et al.  Design, development and evaluation of 3D mold inserts using a rapid prototyping technique and powder-sintering process , 2006 .

[5]  Sadegh Rahmati,et al.  Rapid tooling analysis of Stereolithography injection mould tooling , 2007 .

[6]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Rapid Moulding Using Epoxy Tooling Resin , 2002 .

[7]  Steve Upcraft,et al.  The rapid prototyping technologies , 2003 .

[8]  R. Gregorio,et al.  Thermal conductivity behaviour of polymers around glass transition and crystalline melting temperatures , 2013 .

[9]  Russell A. Harris,et al.  Selection of mould design variables in direct stereolithography injection mould tooling , 2002 .

[10]  M. Duke,et al.  Investigation of electroless nickel plating on rapid prototyping material of acrylic resin , 2016 .

[11]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Layer thickness and draft angle selection for stereolithography injection mould tooling , 2002 .

[12]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Rapid Tooling Injection Molded Prototypes: A Case Study in Artificial Photosynthesis Technology☆ , 2014 .

[13]  M. Duke,et al.  Development of rapid tooling by rapid prototyping technology and electroless nickel plating for low-volume production of plastic parts , 2015 .

[14]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Predicting stereolithography injection mould tool behaviour using models to predict ejection force and tool strength , 2000 .

[15]  Julien Gardan,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends , 2016 .

[16]  Sadegh Rahmati,et al.  Stereolithography for injection mould tooling , 1997 .

[17]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Thermal effects on stereolithography tools during injection moulding , 2004 .