Reliability and Validity of a Dual‐Task Force Platform Assessment of Balance Performance: Effect of Age, Balance Impairment, and Cognitive Task

OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study was to identify whether performing a balance task on a force platform while performing a cognitive task (backwards counting by three) could discriminate between healthy older people and older people at mildly increased risk of falling better than performing the balance task alone. Additional aims were to identify the effect of age on balance performance and to investigate the retest reliability and concurrent validity of the balance measures. DESIGN Cross-sectional-cohort, three-group comparison design. SETTING Gait and balance testing laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Twenty healthy young adults (HY, mean age +/- standard deviation = 26.4 +/- 1 years), 20 healthy older adults (HO, 73.8 +/- 6.0 years), and 20 older adults with mild increase in falls risk (MIFR, 74.8 +/- 3 years). MEASUREMENTS All subjects were tested on the balance task alone and while performing a concurrent cognitive task on the Chattecx Balance System (CBS) under three platform conditions: stable platform (stable), dynamic platform with forward-backward tilting (F-B), and dynamic platform with side-to-side tilting (S-S) and on the step test, timed up-and-go, and gait measures. RESULTS There was a significant difference between HY and HO on the S-S and F-B conditions, both with and without the addition of the cognitive task (P< .05), but not under stable platform conditions. There were also significant differences between the HO and MIFR groups under stable and F-B conditions (P< .05). A three-way analysis of variance identified significant main effects for group, platform condition and task (P< .05), group-by-platform interaction, and platform-by-task interaction. The F-B condition with the cognitive task most effectively discriminated between groups. Post hoc analyses revealed that the F-B condition with cognitive task was associated with the highest accuracy in classifying subjects from the two older groups, with a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 0.8. Retest reliability for most CBS measures was moderate to high, and correlations between dynamic CBS measures and clinical measures were high. CONCLUSION Measurement of dynamic balance on the CBS (F-B) with a cognitive task is a reliable measure that discriminates well between healthy older people and those with a mild increase in risk of falling.

[1]  W A Ray,et al.  Clinical and biomechanical measures of balance as fall predictors in ambulatory nursing home residents. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[3]  A B Schultz,et al.  Stepping over obstacles: dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  B. E. Maki,et al.  A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  R. Penhall,et al.  Walking with its training effects on the fitness and activity patterns of 79-91 year old females. , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[6]  S R Lord,et al.  Simple physiological and clinical tests for the accurate prediction of falling in older people. , 1996, Gerontology.

[7]  P J Sparto,et al.  Effect of aging on human postural control during cognitive tasks. , 1997, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[8]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Changes in balance and locomotion measures during rehabilitation following stroke. , 1998, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[9]  R Dickstein,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of stance balance performance in the clinic using a novel measurement device. , 1993, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada.

[10]  D L Sackett,et al.  The rational clinical examination. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. , 1992, JAMA.

[11]  Keith D. Hill,et al.  Retest Reliability of Centre of Pressure Measures of Standing Balance in Healthy Older Women , 1995 .

[12]  P. Goldie,et al.  Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  A. Campbell,et al.  Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  W Poewe,et al.  Influence of Concurrent Tasks on Gait: A Dual-Task Approach , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  B E Maki,et al.  Influence of arousal and attention on the control of postural sway. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[16]  Keith D. Hill,et al.  A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients : Reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly , 1996 .

[17]  Leon Flicker,et al.  Falls among healthy, community‐dwelling, older women: a prospective study of frequency, circumstances, consequences and prediction accuracy , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[18]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  A M Wing,et al.  Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[20]  L Nyberg,et al.  Attention, Frailty, and Falls: The Effect of a Manual Task on Basic Mobility , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  R. Baloh,et al.  Comparison of Static and Dynamic Posturography in Young and Older Normal People , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.