Using an auditory sensory substitution device to augment vision: evidence from eye movements

Sensory substitution devices convert information normally associated with one sense into another sense (e.g. converting vision into sound). This is often done to compensate for an impaired sense. The present research uses a multimodal approach in which both natural vision and sound-from-vision (‘soundscapes’) are simultaneously presented. Although there is a systematic correspondence between what is seen and what is heard, we introduce a local discrepancy between the signals (the presence of a target object that is heard but not seen) that the participant is required to locate. In addition to behavioural responses, the participants’ gaze is monitored with eye-tracking. Although the target object is only presented in the auditory channel, behavioural performance is enhanced when visual information relating to the non-target background is presented. In this instance, vision may be used to generate predictions about the soundscape that enhances the ability to detect the hidden auditory object. The eye-tracking data reveal that participants look for longer in the quadrant containing the auditory target even when they subsequently judge it to be located elsewhere. As such, eye movements generated by soundscapes reveal the knowledge of the target location that does not necessarily correspond to the actual judgment made. The results provide a proof of principle that multimodal sensory substitution may be of benefit to visually impaired people with some residual vision and, in normally sighted participants, for guiding search within complex scenes.

[1]  Jung-Kyong Kim,et al.  Generalized Learning of Visual-to-auditory Substitution in Sighted Individuals , 2008 .

[2]  Jon Driver,et al.  Auditory and multisensory aspects of visuospatial neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Peter A Hancock,et al.  Improving target detection in visual search through the augmenting multi-sensory cues , 2013, Ergonomics.

[4]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Representing colour through hearing and touch in sensory substitution devices. , 2013, Multisensory research.

[5]  B. Grothe,et al.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. , 2010, Physiological reviews.

[6]  Anne Bol,et al.  Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[9]  Stephen R. Arnott,et al.  The auditory dorsal pathway: Orienting vision , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[10]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Seeing with Sound? Exploring Different Characteristics of a Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Device , 2011, Perception.

[12]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  S Levy-Tzedek,et al.  Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[14]  A J Van Opstal,et al.  Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in a complex scene. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[17]  Thomas D. Wright,et al.  The evolution of a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device using interactive genetic algorithms , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  J. Zihl,et al.  Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  David Alais,et al.  Amplitude-modulated auditory stimuli influence selection of visual spatial frequencies. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[20]  H Colonius,et al.  A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Trullemans,et al.  A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  M. Ptito,et al.  Multisensory integration, sensory substitution and visual rehabilitation , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Compensatory strategies following visual search training in patients with homonymous hemianopia: an eye movement study , 2010, Journal of Neurology.

[26]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Saccadic responses evoked by presentation of visual and auditory targets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  B. Stein,et al.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  Cross-sensory transfer of sensory-motor information: visuomotor learning affects performance on an audiomotor task, using sensory-substitution , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Acoustical Vision of Neglected Stimuli: Interaction among Spatially Converging Audiovisual Inputs in Neglect Patients , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Volder,et al.  Pattern recognition using a device substituting audition for vision in blindfolded sighted subjects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Poke and pop: Tactile–visual synchrony increases visual saliency , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.