Plant growth rates and seed size: a re-evaluation.

Small-seeded plant species are often reported to have high relative growth rate or RGR. However, because RGR declines as plants grow larger, small-seeded species could achieve higher RGR simply by virtue of their small size. In contrast, size-standardized growth rate or SGR factors out these size effects. Differences in SGR can thus only be due to differences in morphology, allocation, or physiology. We used nonlinear regression to calculate SGR for comparison with RGR for 10 groups of species spanning a wide range of life forms. We found that RGR was negatively correlated with seed mass in nearly all groups, but the relationship between SGR and seed mass was highly variable. We conclude that small-seeded species only sometimes possess additional adaptations for rapid growth over and above their general size advantage.

[1]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Adaptation and extinction in experimentally fragmented landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[3]  M. Rees,et al.  Why do big plants make big seeds? , 2007 .

[4]  F. Woodward,et al.  Ecophysiological traits in C3 and C4 grasses: a phylogenetically controlled screening experiment. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[5]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  How to fit nonlinear plant growth models and calculate growth rates: an update for ecologists , 2012 .

[6]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[7]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[8]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Plant growth analysis: an evaluation of experimental design and computational methods , 1996 .

[9]  Peter J. Grubb,et al.  Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals , 1993 .

[10]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[11]  Madhav Gadgil,et al.  The Concept of r- and K-Selection: Evidence from Wild Flowers and Some Theoretical Considerations , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  META-ANALYSIS OF SOURCES OF VARIATION IN FITNESS COSTS OF PLANT ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSES , 2002 .

[13]  P. Grubb,et al.  Growth and mortality in high and low light: trends among 15 shade‐tolerant tropical rain forest tree species , 2003 .

[14]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  A new method for measuring relative growth rate can uncover the costs of defensive compounds in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[15]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Evolution of plant resistance and tolerance to frost damage , 2004 .

[17]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Why equalising trade-offs aren't always neutral. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[18]  R. Peters,et al.  The allometry of seed weight and seedling relative growth rate. , 1990 .

[19]  C. Baraloto,et al.  Seed size, seedling morphology, and response to deep shade and damage in neotropical rain forest trees. , 2007, American journal of botany.

[20]  G. Ågren,et al.  Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth , 1992 .

[21]  Bernhard Schmid,et al.  Growth rates, seed size, and physiology: do small-seeded species really grow faster? , 2008, Ecology.

[22]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal Landscapes: Disturbance and the Dynamics of Pattern , 1981 .

[23]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[24]  J. Alcántara,et al.  Seedling establishment in Olea europaea: Seed size and microhabitat affect growth and survival1 , 2004 .

[25]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Modelling the growth of parasitic plants , 2010 .

[26]  R. Hunt,et al.  Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species , 1997 .

[27]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. , 2008, Ecology.

[28]  Comparative ecology of seed mass in Psychotria (Rubiaceae): within- and between-species effects of seed mass on early performance , 2005 .

[29]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Partitioning the Components of Relative Growth Rate: How Important Is Plant Size Variation? , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[30]  S. Pacala,et al.  Models Suggesting Field Experiments to Test Two Hypotheses Explaining Successional Diversity , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Using knockout mutants to reveal the growth costs of defensive traits , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species , 2002 .

[33]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[34]  Joy Bergelson,et al.  Surveying Patterns in the Cost of Resistance in Plants , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  The costs and benefits of fast living. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[36]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .