(MC2)2: criteria, requirements and a software prototype for Cloud infrastructure decisions

Cloud computing is a disruptive technology, representing a new model for information technology solution engineering and management that promises to introduce significant cost savings and other benefits. The adoption of Cloud computing requires a detailed comparison of infrastructure alternatives, taking a number of aspects into careful consideration. Existing methods of evaluation, however, limit decision‐making to the relative costs of Cloud computing, but do not take a broader range of criteria into account. The Multi‐Criteria Comparison Method for Cloud Computing ( (MC2)2 ) offers a multi‐criteria‐based decision framework that can be applied to Cloud computing. The framework allows organizations to create evaluation methods that help to determine what infrastructure best suits their needs by evaluating and ranking infrastructure alternatives using multiple criteria derived from a comprehensive criteria catalog. Therefore, (MC2)2 offers a way to differentiate infrastructures not only by costs but also in terms of benefits, opportunities and risks. (MC2)2 can be adapted to facilitate a wide array of decision‐making scenarios within the domain of information technology infrastructures, depending on the criteria selected to support the framework. The software prototype presented in this paper creates an interface to decision‐makers that makes the framework more usable for Cloud infrastructure decisions in practice. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing , 2009 .

[2]  De-Li Yang,et al.  Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[4]  Albert G. Greenberg,et al.  The cost of a cloud: research problems in data center networks , 2008, CCRV.

[5]  Frederick S. Pardee,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of transportation system effectiveness , 1969 .

[6]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Making the information systems outsourcing decision: A transaction cost approach to analyzing outsourcing decision problems , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Hirschheim Information Systems Outsourcing , 2002 .

[8]  T. Saaty Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP) , 2004 .

[9]  Godwin G. Udo Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[11]  Marten Schönherr,et al.  (MC2)2: A Generic Decision-Making Framework and its Application to Cloud Computing , 2010, ArXiv.

[12]  Amip J. Shah,et al.  Cost Model for Planning, Development and Operation of a Data Center , 2005 .

[13]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[14]  Markus Klems,et al.  Do Clouds Compute? A Framework for Estimating the Value of Cloud Computing , 2008, WEB.

[15]  Edward Walker,et al.  The Real Cost of a CPU Hour , 2009, Computer.

[16]  Jörg Schäfer,et al.  Cloud Computing : Evolution in der Technik, Revolution im Business; BITKOM-Leitfaden , 2013 .