Diverse Sensitivity Thresholds in Dynamic Signaling Responses by Social Amoebae

Dictyostelium cells with increased responsiveness to chemoattractant may promote propagation of the initial signal across the cell population. Genetically Identical, But Not Equally Sensitive Individual cells of the social amoeba Dictyostelium can organize to form multicellular ensembles, a process in which the chemoattractant cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) triggers production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) to induce polarization of the chemotaxing cells. Cell population responses have generally been averaged; however, Wang et al. found that not all cells in a group of genetically identical Dictyostelium cells produced PIP3 in response to cAMP and that more cells produced PIP3 as the cAMP concentration increased. Furthermore, modeling and experiments suggested that an amplification step occurred downstream of an adaptive signaling network and that different cells had different amplification thresholds. Different sensitivities and thresholds for signal amplification may enable highly responsive individual cells to promote chemotaxis of an entire population of Dictyostelium cells and, thus, mediate collective behavior. The complex transition from a single-cell to a multicellular life form during the formation of a fruiting body by the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum is accompanied by a pulsatile collective signaling process that instigates chemotaxis of the constituent cells. Although the cells used for the analysis of this phenomenon are normally genetically identical (isogenic), it is not clear whether they are equally responsive to the waves of the signaling stimulus, nor is it clear how responses across the population influence collective cell behavior. Here, we found that isogenic Dictyostelium cells displayed differing sensitivities to the chemoattractant cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Furthermore, the resulting signaling responses could be explained by a model in which cells are refractory to further stimulation for 5 to 6 min after the initial input and the signaling output is amplified, with the amplification threshold varying across the cells in the population. This pathway structure could explain intracellular amplification of the chemoattractant gradient during cell migration. The new model predicts that diverse cell responsiveness can facilitate collective cell behavior, specifically due to the presence of a small number of cells in the population with increased responsiveness that aid in propagating the initial cAMP signaling wave across the cell population.

[1]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Cyclic 3', 5'-AMP relay in dictyostelium discoideum. IV. Recovery of the cAMP signaling response after adaptation to cAMP , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  J. Ferrell Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  H. Othmer,et al.  A discrete cell model with adaptive signalling for aggregation of Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemoattractant receptor signaling: G protein-dependent and -independent pathways. , 1997, Advances in second messenger and phosphoprotein research.

[5]  D. Wheatley,et al.  Signaling in unicellular eukaryotes. , 1998, International review of cytology.

[6]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[7]  D. Murphy,et al.  G Protein Signaling Events Are Activated at the Leading Edge of Chemotactic Cells , 1998, Cell.

[8]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[9]  A J Wardlaw,et al.  Eosinophils in asthma and other allergic diseases. , 2000, British medical bulletin.

[10]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[11]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[12]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins in Living Cells , 2001, Science.

[14]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery disease: pathogenesis and acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[15]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Modeling the Cell's Guidance System , 2002, Science's STKE.

[17]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[18]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Two phases of actin polymerization display different dependencies on PI(3,4,5)P3 accumulation and have unique roles during chemotaxis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Sensitization of Dictyostelium chemotaxis by phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mediated self-organizing signalling patches , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  J. Segall,et al.  Chemotaxis of metastatic tumor cells: Clues to mechanisms from the Dictyostelium paradigm , 1992, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[21]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[22]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Patel,et al.  Chemokines and leukocyte trafficking in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2006, Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology.

[24]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Distinct roles of PI(3,4,5)P3 during chemoattractant signaling in Dictyostelium: a quantitative in vivo analysis by inhibition of PI3-kinase. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Mechanisms of gradient detection: a comparison of axon pathfinding with eukaryotic cell migration. , 2007, International review of cytology.

[26]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Science.

[28]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  PI3-kinase signaling contributes to orientation in shallow gradients and enhances speed in steep chemoattractant gradients , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[31]  Xuehua Xu,et al.  How human leukocytes track down and destroy pathogens: lessons learned from the model organism Dictyostelium discoideum , 2009, Immunologic research.

[32]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation , 2009, Cell.

[33]  H. Levine,et al.  Transient localized patterns in noise-driven reaction-diffusion systems. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[34]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Robert E. Cohen,et al.  The Onset of Collective Behavior in Social Amoebae , 2011 .