Importance of access to research information among individuals with spinal cord injury: results of an evidenced-based questionnaire

Objective: To assess the interests and accessibility of patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) to information in different areas of SCI.Setting: Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network.Methods: An interest assessment survey and the SF-36 (short form-36) questionnaire were mailed to SCI patients living in the community. The interest assessment examined patients' interest in information in many areas related to SCI, their current knowledge in these areas and the accessibility of different information formats.Results: Fourteen patients (45%) completed the questionnaires. Regardless of physical or mental health status, all patients expressed a high level of interest in SCI research and clinical trials. An Internet website proved to be the most preferred, accessible and comfortable information format for these patients. Patients expressed a lower interest in support groups and organizations. Results from the SF-36 showed poor social functioning was related to interest in support groups, and poor general health perception was related to interest in occupational and physical therapy.Conclusion: The majority of SCI patients have a high interest in accessing SCI research information. The Internet is a favorable, comfortable and accessible tool for providing this information and will benefit all SCI patients. These results suggest that a significant number of patients with SCI would benefit from an accessible Internet-based information database that is relevant to the SCI patients population.

[1]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Comparison of the Quality of Well-being Scale and the SF-36 results among two samples of ill adults: AIDS and other illnesses. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  L. Noreau,et al.  Productivity outcomes of individuals with spinal cord injury , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[3]  A. Shmueli The SF-36 Profile and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Interpretative Analysis , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  M. Myslinski Comparison of a Generic to Disease-Targeted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures for Multiple Sclerosis. , 2000 .

[5]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[6]  J P Lubicky,et al.  Long-term outcomes and life satisfaction of adults who had pediatric spinal cord injuries. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Broton,et al.  Perceived difficulty in dealing with consequences of spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[9]  R. Yezierski,et al.  Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  D. Gladman,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  A. Stewart,et al.  Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach , 1992 .

[12]  Spoltore Ta,et al.  Rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured patient. , 1995 .

[13]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. , 2001, Spine.

[14]  S. Stansfeld,et al.  Assessing the validity of the SF-36 General Health Survey , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[15]  M Dijkers,et al.  Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  R. Stewart,et al.  Promoting group empowerment and self-reliance through participatory research: a case study of people with physical disability. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  H. Doll,et al.  Evaluation of index and profile measures of health status in a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol, and disease specific measures. , 1997, Medical care.

[19]  N K Aaronson,et al.  An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. , 1997, Medical care.

[20]  W H Rogers,et al.  Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1995, Medical care.

[21]  C. Granger,et al.  Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  R. Hays,et al.  Comparison of a generic to disease-targeted health-related quality-of-life measures for multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.