Seeding for Quality of Platform Complements: Evidence from Amazon's Alexa Ecosystem

An important objective for digital platform governance is to ensure the creation of high-quality complements. For nascent platforms, complements are typically the main force in attracting early adopters and, consequently, further improving platform’s attractiveness to potential complementors. In this research-in-progress paper, we study seeding – direct financial support to selected complements by the platform owner – as an indirect governance mechanism in motivating the complement quality improvement in general. The dataset consists of 499 connected home complements on Amazon’s Alexa platform that were released during the first three years after the platform launch. The preliminary findings reveal that complements launched after platform owner’s seeding actions generally show better quality. Such a quality improvement effect seems to be reinforced if the platform owner can conduct repetitive seeding on the same complement. However, the effectiveness of repetitive seeding may vary depending on the investment and the maturity of the target complement’s business.

[1]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[2]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Building the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns , 2018 .

[3]  Elizabeth Price,et al.  The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management , 2014 .

[4]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy--and How to Make Them Work for You , 2016 .

[5]  Dennis Kundisch,et al.  Platform Launch Strategies , 2018, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[6]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions And Firm Performance , 2008 .

[7]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[8]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Synergy: Architectural Origins and Competitive Consequences , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Failure to Launch: Critical Mass in Platform Businesses , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[14]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview , 2011 .

[15]  NieminenMarko,et al.  Platform as a Strategy , 2016 .

[16]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[18]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Mobile Application Quality and Platform Stickiness under Formal vs. Self-Control - Evidence from an Experimental Study , 2014, ICIS.

[21]  Dominik Dellermann,et al.  Minimizing Complementors' Risk in Third-Party Innovation: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Digital Platform Configurations , 2017, HICSS.

[22]  Tobias Kretschmer,et al.  Platform Architecture, Multihoming and Complement Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Video Game Industry , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[24]  T. Kretschmer,et al.  When Less Can Be More – Setting Technology Levels in Complementary Goods Markets , 2014 .

[25]  J. Choi,et al.  Tying, Investment, and the Dynamic Leverage Theory , 2000 .

[26]  Navdeep S. Sahni Advertising Spillovers: Evidence from Online Field Experiments and Implications for Returns on Advertising , 2016 .

[27]  Armin Heinzl,et al.  Does Platform Owner's Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence From Google Photos , 2016, ICIS.

[28]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..