Empirical analyses of null-hypothesis perfusion FMRI data at 1.5 and 4 T

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) based on arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion contrast is an emergent methodology for visualizing brain function both at rest and during task performance. Because of the typical pairwise subtraction approach in generating perfusion images, ASL contrast manifests different noise properties and offers potential advantages for some experimental designs as compared with blood oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast. We studied the noise properties and statistical power of ASL contrast, with a focus on temporal autocorrelation and spatial coherence, at both 1.5- and 4.0-T field strengths. Perfusion fMRI time series were found to be roughly independent in time, and voxelwise statistical analysis assuming independence of observations yielded false-positive rates compatible with theoretical values using appropriate analysis methods. Unlike BOLD fMRI data, perfusion data were not found to have spatial coherence that varied across temporal frequency. This finding has implications for the application of spatial smoothing to perfusion data. It was also found that the spatial coherence of the ASL data is greater at high magnetic field than low field, and including the global signal as a covariate in the general linear model improves the central tendency of test statistic as well as reduces the noise level in perfusion fMRI, especially at high magnetic field.

[1]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Removal of Confounding Effects of Global Signal in Functional MRI Analyses , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  X. Hu,et al.  Reduction of signal fluctuation in functional MRI using navigator echoes , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  David C. Alsop,et al.  Perfusion fMRI with Arterial Spin Labeling , 2000 .

[4]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Inferential Impact of Global Signal Covariates in Functional Neuroimaging Analyses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A general statistical analysis for fMRI data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Robust Smoothness Estimation in Statistical Parametric Maps Using Standardized Residuals from the General Linear Model , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Z H Cho,et al.  NMR functional imaging using a tailored RF gradient echo sequence: A true susceptibility measurement technique , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  Physiological Noise: Strategies for Correction , 2000 .

[11]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[12]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Constable,et al.  Composite image formation in z‐shimmed functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[15]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Multislice Imaging of Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion with Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Frequency offset corrected inversion (FOCI) pulses for use in localized spectroscopy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  R. Buxton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II) , 1998 .

[18]  Wolfgang Engelien,et al.  A CBF-Based Event-Related Brain Activation Paradigm: Characterization of Impulse–Response Function and Comparison to BOLD , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M J Welch,et al.  Blood-brain barrier permeability of 11C-labeled alcohols and 15O-labeled water. , 1976, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  S P Patil,et al.  Power Spectrum Analysis , 2000 .

[23]  G. Glover,et al.  Correction of physiologically induced global off‐resonance effects in dynamic echo‐planar and spiral functional imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  E. C. Wong,et al.  Potential and Pitfalls of Arterial Spin Labeling Based Perfusion Imaging Techniques for MRI , 2000 .

[25]  R. Buxton,et al.  Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[28]  B. Biswal,et al.  High‐resolution fMRI using multislice partial k‐space GR‐EPI with cubic voxels , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  J. Detre,et al.  Arterial spin labeling perfusion fMRI with very low task frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[31]  E Zarahn,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. II. Spatially smoothed data collected under null-hypothesis and experimental conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  To Smooth or Not to Smooth? Bias and Efficiency in fMRI Time-Series Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[33]  G M Hathout,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human Rolandic cortex. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[34]  R B Buxton,et al.  A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  B. Rosen,et al.  MRI measurement of the temporal evolution of relative CMRO2 during rat forepaw stimulation , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Seong-Gi Kim Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mapping , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Simple measurement of scanner stability for functional NMR imaging of activation in the brain , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Localized cerebral blood flow response at submillimeter columnar resolution , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Schnall,et al.  Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  J. Detre,et al.  Reduced Transit-Time Sensitivity in Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Cerebral Blood Flow , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[42]  E C Wong,et al.  Comparison of simultaneously measured perfusion and BOLD signal increases during brain activation with T1‐based tissue identification , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T , 1999, NeuroImage.

[44]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[45]  J. Detre,et al.  Technical aspects and utility of fMRI using BOLD and ASL , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[47]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[48]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Lin Li,et al.  Reduced susceptibility effects in perfusion fMRI with single-shot spin-echo EPI acquisitions at 1.5 Tesla. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[50]  J. Duyn,et al.  Investigation of Low Frequency Drift in fMRI Signal , 1999, NeuroImage.