Examining Relationships and Patterns in Pedagogical Beliefs, Attitudes, and Classroom Practices for Faculty of Undergraduate Engineering, Math, and Science Foundational Courses

The beliefs and practices of 21 faculty engaged in the STEM instruction of freshmen engineering students were examined in this study. Specifically, the degree to which faculty beliefs conformed to a Student-centered approach versus a Teacher-centered approach, and the degree to which these orientations were related to learner-centered classroom practice, was assessed. Four data collection methods were employed: faculty interviews, faculty surveys, observation protocol scores and qualitative classroom observations. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of faculty responses to the Approaches to Teaching Inventory revealed three coherent groups of faculty who held common beliefs: Faculty who displayed Student-centered beliefs, faculty who displayed Teacher-centered beliefs, and faculty who displayed non-discriminatory beliefs. These beliefs corresponded closely to assessment of their classroom practice. Student-centered faculty engaged in more learner centered practices than either Teacher-centered faculty or nondiscriminating faculty. Results showed that the Freshman Engineering departments and the Mathematics department had the most within-department consistency in their teaching delivery and environment. Instruction delivery ranged from mostly lecture with pauses for questions in one of the physics classes, to shared problem solving in one of the mathematics classes, to student led activities in engineering. Student interactions with each other during class ranged from very little, particularly in the large lecture halls, to almost constant collaboration in classes with laboratory formats. Implications for faculty development for the improvement of freshman engineering programs are discussed.

[1]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses. , 2013 .

[2]  J. Hattie,et al.  Syntheses of educational productivity research , 1987 .

[3]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  Use of learner-centered instruction in college science and mathematics classrooms , 2003 .

[4]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments , 2010 .

[5]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory , 2004 .

[6]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2013 .

[7]  Irene Bloom,et al.  Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol , 2002 .

[8]  Maria L. Blanton,et al.  Using valsiner’s zone theory to interpret Teaching practices in mathematics and science Classrooms , 2005 .

[9]  M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj,et al.  Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? , 2012 .

[10]  Jeffrey H. D. Cornelius-White Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  V. Faw A psychotherapeutic method of teaching psychology. , 1949 .

[12]  M. Weimer Focus on Learning, Transform Teaching , 2003 .

[13]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  The Role of Collaborative Reflection on Shaping Engineering Faculty Teaching Approaches , 2009 .

[14]  Jennifer L. Momsen,et al.  What We Say is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs , 2011 .