Traction forces generated during studded boot‐surface interactions on third‐generation artificial turf: A novel mechanistic perspective

The traction forces generated during studded boot–surface interactions affect player performance and injury risk. Over 20 years of empirical research into traction on third generation (3G) artificial turf has met with only limited success in supporting the development of safer surfaces and boots. Thus, the purpose of this perspective article is to present a conceptual framework for generating scientific understanding on 3G turf traction through a novel mechanistic approach. A three-stage framework is proposed. Firstly, the hypothesized traction mechanisms and related analytical equations are identified, namely: friction between the boot outsole and surface; shear resistance of the performance infill layer to the outsole; and compressive resistance of the performance infill layer to horizontal stud displacement. Secondly, a Concept Map is generated to visually represent the contribution of the thirtynine variables identified as directly affecting the traction response. Finally, a Research Roadmap is constructed to guide the direction of future traction studies towards the development of safer surfaces and boots as well as improved mechanical tests to assess surface safety. The proposed framework represents the first attempt to deconstruct bootsurface interactions and hypothesize the science behind the mobilization of traction forces.

[1]  D. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The effect of translational and rotational traction on lower extremity joint loading , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  R. W. Higgins,et al.  Football Cleat Design and Its Effect on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Actual and perceived running performance in soccer shoes: A series of eight studies , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Traction on artificial turf: development of a soccer shoe outsole , 2010 .

[5]  Steve Haake,et al.  High-speed observations of football-boot-surface interactions of players in their natural environment , 2007 .

[6]  Kathryn A. Severn,et al.  Science of synthetic turf surfaces: Player–surface interactions , 2010 .

[7]  J. Sánchez-Sánchez,et al.  Influence of the Mechanical Properties of Third-Generation Artificial Turf Systems on Soccer Players’ Physiological and Physical Performance and Their Perceptions , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The influence of soccer cleat design on resultant joint moments , 2010 .

[9]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Shoe traction and surface compliance affect performance of soccer-related movements , 2014 .

[10]  Tomaso Villa,et al.  Does soccer cleat design influence the rotational interaction with the playing surface? , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[11]  David McGhie,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of traction at the shoe-surface interface on third-generation artificial turf , 2013 .

[12]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Registration of cruciate ligament injuries in Norwegian top level team handball. A prospective study covering two seasons , 1997, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Wear influences footwear traction properties in Canadian high school football , 2009 .

[14]  J. Crandall,et al.  The mechanics of American football cleats on natural grass and infill-type artificial playing surfaces with loads relevant to elite athletes , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[15]  Wolfgang Potthast,et al.  Motion differences in goal kicking on natural and artificial soccer turf systems , 2010 .

[16]  R. Bahr,et al.  A prospective cohort study of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite Norwegian team handball , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[17]  Gijs Debuyck,et al.  Cutting performance wearing different studded soccer shoes on dry and wet artificial turf , 2014 .

[18]  J Ekstrand,et al.  Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female elite football players , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[19]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Peak Torque and Rotational Stiffness Developed at the Shoe-Surface Interface , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  C. Bignardi,et al.  Amateur football pitches: Mechanical properties of the natural ground and of different artificial turf infills and their biomechanical implications , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  Rudy Verhelst,et al.  Football-specific evaluation of player–surface interaction on different football turf systems , 2010 .

[22]  Lozano,et al.  The influence of friction on sports surfaces in turning movements , 1999 .

[23]  B M Nigg,et al.  Surface-Related Injuries in Soccer , 1989, Sports medicine.

[24]  R. Whiteley,et al.  Higher shoe-surface interaction is associated with doubling of lower extremity injury risk in football codes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[25]  Matt Carré,et al.  Improving the performance of soccer boots on artificial and natural soccer surfaces , 2010 .

[26]  Michael Ferrandino,et al.  The Player Surface Interaction of Rugby Players with 3G Artificial Turf During Rugby Specific Movements , 2015 .

[27]  Darren J Stefanyshyn,et al.  Footwear Traction and Lower Extremity Joint Loading , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  Rubim Santos,et al.  The influence of different soccer cleat type on kinetic, kinematic and neuromuscular ankle variables in artificial turf , 2017 .

[29]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The effect of normal load, speed and moisture on footwear traction , 2011 .

[30]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  STUD LENGTH AND STUD GEOMETRY OF SOCCER BOOTS INFLUENCE RUNNING PERFORMANCE ON THIRD GENERATION ARTIFICIAL TURF , 2009 .

[31]  Stephanie E. Forrester,et al.  Maintenance of Artificial Turf – Putting Research into Practice☆ , 2016 .

[32]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Footwear traction at different areas on artificial and natural grass fields , 2012 .

[33]  Thorsten Sterzing,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of player-surface interaction on artificial soccer turf , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[34]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Torsional injuries of the lower limb: an analysis of the frictional torque between different types of football turf and the shoe outsole , 2012, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[35]  Geng Luo,et al.  Footwear traction and lower extremity noncontact injury. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  R. Haut,et al.  The effects of various infills, fibre structures, and shoe designs on generating rotational traction on an artificial surface , 2009 .

[37]  J. Crandall,et al.  The mechanical interactions between an American football cleat and playing surfaces in-situ at loads and rates generated by elite athletes: a comparison of playing surfaces , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[38]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. , 1989 .

[39]  Ga Valiant,et al.  Traction Characteristics of Outsoles for Use on Artificial Playing Surfaces , 1990 .

[40]  B M Nigg,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of playing surfaces. , 1987, Journal of sports sciences.

[41]  John William Wannop,et al.  Influence of basketball shoe mass, outsole traction, and forefoot bending stiffness on three athletic movements , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[42]  B Stapelfeldt,et al.  Effect of soccer shoe cleats on knee joint loads. , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.

[43]  Laura H Charalambous,et al.  The effects of artificial surface temperature on mechanical properties and player kinematics during landing and acceleration , 2015, Journal of sport and health science.

[44]  Leonor Gallardo,et al.  Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: The consequences of no quality certification , 2012 .

[45]  John W Powell,et al.  An Analysis of Specific Lower Extremity Injury Rates on Grass and FieldTurf Playing Surfaces in National Football League Games , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[46]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  Effect of turf on the cutting movement of female football players , 2014 .

[47]  P. Milburn,et al.  Shoe-Surface Interaction and the Reduction of Injury in Rugby Union , 1998, Sports medicine.

[48]  J. Sánchez-Sánchez,et al.  Effect of structural components, mechanical wear and environmental conditions on the player–surface interaction on artificial turf football pitches , 2018 .

[49]  David McGhie,et al.  On the ‘trench effect’ theory: A biomechanical analysis of the relationship between traction and shoe orientation on third-generation artificial turf , 2014 .

[50]  Youlian Hong,et al.  Higher plantar pressure on the medial side in four soccer-related movements , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[51]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Skin friction related behaviour of artificial turf systems , 2017, Journal of sports sciences.

[52]  Peter D. Milburn,et al.  Tribology, friction and traction: understanding shoe-surface interaction , 2013 .

[53]  João Paulo Vilas-Boas,et al.  Influence of Cleats-Surface Interaction on the Performance and Risk of Injury in Soccer: A Systematic Review , 2017, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[54]  Heather Driscoll,et al.  Influence of outsole design on centre of rotation during turning movements , 2012 .

[55]  I T James,et al.  Advancing natural turf to meet tomorrow’s challenges , 2011 .

[56]  Heather Driscoll,et al.  Measurement of studded shoe–surface interaction metrics during in situ performance analysis , 2015 .

[57]  M. Howard,et al.  Differences in Friction and Torsional Resistance in Athletic Shoe-Turf Surface Interfaces , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[58]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Effects of two football stud configurations on biomechanical characteristics of single-leg landing and cutting movements on infilled synthetic turf , 2014, Sports biomechanics.

[59]  Yaodong Gu,et al.  Effects of Different Soccer Boots on Biomechanical Characteristics of Cutting Movement on Artificial Turf , 2016 .

[60]  John W Powell,et al.  Football Playing Surface and Shoe Design Affect Rotational Traction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[61]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance , 2011 .

[62]  Traction and lower limb motion during rapid turning on different football turf surfaces , 2011 .

[63]  Rajiv Kaila,et al.  Influence of Modern Studded and Bladed Soccer Boots and Sidestep Cutting on Knee Loading during Match Play Conditions , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[64]  Matt Carré,et al.  The influence of gravimetric moisture content on studded shoe–surface interactions in soccer , 2017 .

[65]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Different stud configurations cause movement adaptations during a soccer turning movement , 2010 .

[66]  W E Garrett,et al.  A comparison of cleat types during two football-specific tasks on FieldTurf , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[67]  Howard Hillstrom,et al.  The effect of the shoe-surface interface in the development of anterior cruciate ligament strain. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[68]  Andrew Scott McNitt,et al.  Comparison of Rotational Traction of Athletic Footwear on Varying Playing Surfaces Using Different Normal Loads , 2014 .