Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor

A new approach to the field normalization of the classical journal impact factor is introduced. This approach, called the audience factor, takes into consideration the citing propensity of journals for a given cited journal, specifically, the mean number of references of each citing journal, and fractionally weights the citations from those citing journals. Hence, the audience factor is a variant of a fractional citation-counting scheme, but computed on the citing journal rather than the citing article or disciplinary level, and, in contrast to other cited-side normalization strategies, is focused on the behavior of the citing entities. A comparison with standard journal impact factors from Thomson Reuters shows a more diverse representation of fields within various quintiles of impact, significant movement in rankings for a number of individual journals, but nevertheless a high overall correlation with standard impact factors. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Journal status , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories , 2005, ASIST.

[3]  Oscar Volij,et al.  The Measurement of Intellectual Influence , 2002 .

[4]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice , 2002, Scientometrics.

[5]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[6]  Irina Marshakova-Shaikevich,et al.  The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals , 1996, Scientometrics.

[7]  Michael J. Moravcsik,et al.  Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[9]  Carl T. Bergstrom.  Eigenfactor Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals , 2007 .

[10]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.

[11]  Gabriel Pinski,et al.  Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics , 1976, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Median and percentile impact factors: A set of new indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[13]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Random thoughts on citationology its theory and practice , 1998, Scientometrics.

[14]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Asia vista con el SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) , 2008 .

[15]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.

[16]  B. K. Sen.  Normalised Impact factor , 1992, J. Documentation.

[17]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[18]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis , 1994, Scientometrics.

[19]  Narongrit Sombatsompop,et al.  A modified method for calculating the Impact Factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997–2001 , 2004, Scientometrics.

[20]  Mohammad Hossein Biglu,et al.  The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect , 2007, Scientometrics.

[21]  A. Paraskeva,et al.  Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination , 2002, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.