PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging

ObjectivesDental MRI is often impaired by artefacts due to metallic dental materials. Several sequences were developed to reduce susceptibility artefacts. Here, we evaluated a set of sequences for artefact reduction for dental MRI for the first time.MethodsArtefact volume, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality were assessed on a 3-T MRI for pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), multiple-slab acquisition with view angle tilting gradient, based on a sampling perfection with application-optimised contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence (MSVAT-SPACE), slice-encoding for metal-artefact correction (SEMAC) and compared to a standard SPACE and a standard turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence. Field-of-view and acquisition times were chosen to enable in vivo application. Two implant-supported prostheses were tested (porcelain fused to metal non-precious alloy and monolithic zirconia).ResultsSmallest artefact was measured for TSE sequences with no difference between the standard TSE and the SEMAC. MSVAT-SPACE reduced artefacts about 56% compared to the standard SPACE. Effect of the PETRA was dependent on sample used. Image quality and SNR were comparable for all sequences except PETRA, which yielded poor results.ConclusionThere is no benefit in terms of artefact reduction for SEMAC compared to standard TSE. Usage of MSVAT-SPACE is advantageous since artefacts are reduced and higher resolution is achieved.Key Points• SEMAC is not superior to TSE in terms of artefact reduction.• MSVAT-SPACE reduces susceptibility artefacts while maintaining comparable image quality.• PETRA reduces susceptibility artefacts depending on material but offers poor image quality

[1]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  Dental x‐rays and risk of meningioma , 2013, Cancer.

[2]  Miguel Trelles,et al.  SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE Sequence Strategies for Metal Artifact Reduction in 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Min-Oh Kim,et al.  Artifact reduction from metallic dental materials in T1‐weighted spin‐echo imaging at 3.0 tesla , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  K. Sartor,et al.  Age- and tooth-related pulp cavity signal intensity changes in healthy teeth: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging analysis. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  I. Serša,et al.  T1 relaxation time and magnetic resonance imaging of inflamed gingival tissue. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Florian Schmid,et al.  In vivo MRI‐based dental impression using an intraoral RF receiver coil , 2008 .

[7]  André Gahleitner,et al.  Dental CT: imaging technique, anatomy, and pathologic conditions of the jaws , 2003, European Radiology.

[8]  Lee Friedman,et al.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  V. Rasche,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrashort echo magnetic resonance imaging of orthodontic appliances in the natural dentition. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Jiang Du,et al.  MR imaging near metal with undersampled 3D radial UTE‐MAVRIC sequences , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  P. Monsour,et al.  Implant radiography and radiology. , 2008, Australian dental journal.

[12]  M. Nittka,et al.  Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[13]  Tomasz Gredes,et al.  Artifacts In Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Caused By Dental Materials , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  E. Whaites,et al.  The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[15]  Yusuke Tsutsumi,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  R. Jacobs,et al.  A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[17]  K. Eley,et al.  "Black Bone" MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis--a preliminary feasibility study. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  J. Abrahams,et al.  Dental CT imaging: a look at the jaw. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  Jin-Suck Suh,et al.  Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  Peter M Jakob,et al.  Ultrashort echo time imaging using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  John M Pauly,et al.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  D. Paul,et al.  MSVAT-SPACE for fast metal implants imaging , 2010 .

[24]  S. Vinitski,et al.  Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[25]  Hartmut Dickhaus,et al.  Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material , 2005, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[26]  Z H Cho,et al.  Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. , 1988, Medical physics.

[27]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  P. M. Jakob,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[29]  S A Gronemeyer,et al.  Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice , 2010, European Radiology.