A common auditory-visual space” Evidence for its reality

This experiment compares two hypotheses concerning the relation between auditory anti, visual direction. The first, the “common space” hypothesis, is that both auditory and visual direction are represented on a single underlying direction dimension, so that comparisons between auditory and visual direction may be made directly. The second, the “disjunct space” hypothesis, is that there are two distinct internal dimensions, one for auditory direction and one for visual direction, and that comparison between auditory and visual direction involves a translation between these two dimensions. Both these hypotheses are explicated, using a signal detection theory framework, and evidence is provided for the common space hypothesis.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  John A. Swets,et al.  Factors affecting the slope of empirical ROC curves: Comparison of binary and rating responses , 1967 .

[4]  D. Krantz A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching☆ , 1972 .

[5]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[6]  S. S. Stevens Matching functions between loudness and ten other continua1 , 1966 .

[7]  R. L. Knoll,et al.  The Perception of Temporal Order: Fundamental Issues and a General Model , 1973 .

[8]  S Rosenbloom,et al.  Space Perception in Early Infancy: Perception within a Common Auditory-Visual Space , 1971, Science.

[9]  R. Kinchla,et al.  A theory of visual movement perception. , 1969, Psychological review.

[10]  G. A. Ferguson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[11]  W. A. Wickelgren,et al.  Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments , 1968 .

[12]  C Auerbach Correcting Two-Alternative Forced-Choice Data for Response Bias , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[14]  David H. Warren,et al.  Intermodality interactions in spatial localization , 1970 .

[15]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[17]  E. Boring Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[18]  José Gaussin,et al.  An experimental validation of the signal detection theory for active touch , 1972 .

[19]  R. Kinchla,et al.  A diffusion model of perceptual memory , 1967 .

[20]  S. Freedman The Neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior , 1968 .

[21]  L. K. Canon Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  K. Connolly,et al.  Mechanisms of Motor Skill Development , 1971 .

[23]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[24]  Transitivity of visual judgments of simultaneity. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  E. B. Titchener Sensation and System , 1915 .

[26]  H. Birch,et al.  INTERSENSORY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN. , 1963, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[27]  Simpson We Latencies in intermodal spatial localization. , 1973 .

[28]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.