When Bertlmann wears no socks: contextual common causes as an explanation for quantum correlations

It is well known that correlations produced by common causes in the past cannot violate Bell's inequalities. This was emphasized by Bell in his celebrated example of Bertlmann's socks. However, if common causes are contextual, i.e., actualized at each run of a joint measurement, in a way that depends on the type of joint measurement that is being executed, the resulting correlations are able to violate Bell's inequalities, thus providing a simple and general explanation for the origin of quantum correlations. We illustrate this mechanism by revisiting Bertlmann's socks example. In doing so, we also emphasize that Bell's inequalities, in their essence, are about demarcating non-contextual from contextual common causes, where the latter would operate at the non-spatial level of our physical reality, when the jointly measured entangled entities are microscopic in nature.

[1]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[2]  R. Bertlmann Magic moments with John Bell , 2015 .

[3]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem , 2014, 1404.2429.

[5]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models , 2011, 1112.4045.

[6]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem , 1981 .

[7]  J. Bell BERTLMANN'S SOCKS AND THE NATURE OF REALITY , 1981 .

[8]  Guillaume Adenier,et al.  Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments , 2007 .

[9]  L. I. Ponomarev,et al.  The Quantum Dice , 2021 .

[10]  A. Bednorz Analysis of assumptions of recent tests of local realism , 2015, 1511.03509.

[11]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[12]  L. Ballentine,et al.  Bell’s theorem: Does quantum mechanics contradict relativity? , 1987 .

[13]  N. Gisin,et al.  Experimental test of nonlocal quantum correlation in relativistic configurations , 2000, quant-ph/0007009.

[14]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[15]  Guillaume Adenier,et al.  Test of the no‐signaling principle in the Hensen loophole‐free CHSH experiment , 2016, 1606.00784.

[16]  H. De Raedt,et al.  Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process , 1980 .

[18]  How do we have to Change Quantum Mechanics in Order to Describe Separated Systems , 1984 .

[19]  P. Grangier,et al.  About resonant scattering and other hypothetical effects in the orsay atomic-cascade experiment tests of Bell inequalities: A discussion and some new experimental data , 1985 .

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum measurements as weighted symmetry breaking processes: the hidden measurement perspective , 2016, 1601.05222.

[21]  H. De Raedt,et al.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments: Data analysis and simulation , 2011, 1112.2629.

[22]  A. Aspect Proposed experiment to test the nonseparability of quantum mechanics , 1976 .

[23]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests? , 2017, 1709.00708.

[24]  D. Aerts,et al.  Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: A conceptual analysis and a general representation , 2019, The European Physical Journal Plus.