Advance Organizers: A Review of the Research—Part I

This article reviews previous research on advance organizers, introductory text adjuncts intended to provide the reader of expository text with a meaningful context within which to process unfamiliar, or difficult, new information. Research conducted during the past thirty years well documents the fact that advance organizers do, indeed, inspire significant increases in comprehension among readers whose prior knowledge “subsumers” are inadequate to provide a necessary assimilative context. One issue on which theorists yet disagree, however, is the efficacy of advance organizers in facilitating the acquisition of subordinate text detail, or facts. Definitional inconsistencies and methodological deficiencies in previous research have clouded this issue. Subsequently in this journal, Part II of this article will present the results of two empirical studies that resolve these methodological problems and specifically address the question of the effects of advance organizers on the acquisition of text detail.

[1]  J. Dudley Herron,et al.  Commentary on “the effects of cognitive structure variables on achievement in college chemistry”† , 1973 .

[2]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of the reader's schema at different points in time , 1979 .

[3]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Increasing the Meaningfulness of Quantitative Material by Adapting Context to Student Background. , 1983 .

[4]  Joseph T. Lawton,et al.  Advance Organizers as a Teaching Strategy: A Reply to Barnes and Clawson , 1977 .

[5]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  The effects of cognitive structure variabla on achievement in college chemistry , 1971 .

[6]  Joseph T. Lawton,et al.  The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of Logical Operations and Social Studies Concepts , 1977 .

[7]  D. Ausubel,et al.  The role of discriminability in meaningful learning and retention. , 1961 .

[8]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[9]  D. Ausubel,et al.  In Defense of Advance Organizers: A Reply to the Critics* , 1978 .

[10]  Douglas D. Sjogren,et al.  Effects of Differentially Structured Introductory Materials and Learning Tasks on Learning and Transfer1 , 1968 .

[11]  D. Ausubel,et al.  Role of discriminability in meaningful paralleled learning. , 1963 .

[12]  Wilbur S. Ames,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Advance Organizers on Learning and Retention , 1980 .

[13]  Raymond S. Dean,et al.  Pictorial organization in prose learning , 1983 .

[14]  G. Beeson,et al.  Influence of Knowledge Context on the Learning of Intellectual Skills , 1981 .

[15]  Sue M. Karahalios.  Using Advance Organizers to Improve Comprehension of a Content Text , 1979 .

[16]  Barton B. Proger,et al.  Advance and Concurrent Organizers for Detailed Verbal Passages Used with Elementary School Pupils. , 1973 .

[17]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Prior knowledge or advance organizers as effective variables in chemical learning , 1976 .

[18]  R. Mayer.  Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. , 1975 .

[19]  S. Olejnik,et al.  Imagery/Concreteness Attributes of Advance Organizers. , 1982 .

[20]  D. Ausubel,et al.  A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. , 1962, The Journal of general psychology.

[21]  U. S. Chaudhari,et al.  Educational Technology Research: Whole Versus Part Presentation of Advance Organizers in Text in Relation to Intelligence. , 1981 .

[22]  C. Stone.  A Meta-Analysis of Advanced Organizer Studies. , 1983 .

[23]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Advance organizers that compensate for the organization of text. , 1978 .

[24]  D. Allen,et al.  Some Effects of Advance Organizers and Level of Question on the Learning and Retention of Written Social Studies Material. , 1970 .

[25]  Karl D. Hesse,et al.  The Effects of Prereading Assistance on the Comprehension and Attitudes of Good and Poor Readers. , 1969 .

[26]  D. Ausubel,et al.  Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. , 1962 .

[27]  C. Stone,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Advance Organizer Studies , 1983 .

[28]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[29]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse , 1977 .

[30]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The sequencing of instruction and the concept of assimilation-to-schema , 1977 .

[31]  B. H. Layne,et al.  Advance Organizers as Aids for Reading: Nature of the Learner and the Learning. , 1981 .

[32]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. , 1980 .

[33]  Harold Cook,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  Difference recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers. , 1980 .

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  Difference recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers. , 1980 .

[36]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schemata as Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse , 1977 .

[37]  Elmer U. Clawson,et al.  Do Advance Organizers Facilitate Learning? Recommendations for Further Research Based on an Analysis of 32 Studies , 1975 .

[38]  Livingston Alexander,et al.  Facilitation of Learning and Retention of Oral Instruction Using Advance and Post Organizers. , 1979 .

[39]  J. T. Lawton,et al.  The Effects of Different Types of Advance Organizers on Classification Learning , 1979 .