Evaluation of potential image acquisition pitfalls during optical coherence tomography and their influence on retinal image segmentation.

The development of improved segmentation algorithms for more consistently accurate detection of retinal boundaries is a potentially useful solution to the limitations of existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) software. We modeled artifacts related to operator errors that may normally occur during OCT imaging and evaluated their influence on segmentation results using a novel segmentation algorithm. These artifacts included: defocusing, depolarization, decentration, and a combination of defocusing and depolarization. Mean relative reflectance and average thickness of the automatically extracted intraretinal layers was then measured. Our results show that defocusing and depolarization errors together have the greatest altering effect on all measurements and on segmentation accuracy. A marked decrease in mean relative reflectance and average thickness was observed due to depolarization artifact in all intraretinal layers, while defocus resulted in a less-marked decrease. Decentration resulted in a marked but not significant change in average thickness. Our study demonstrates that care must be taken for good-quality imaging when measurements of intraretinal layers using the novel algorithm are planned in future studies. An awareness of these pitfalls and their possible solutions is crucial for obtaining a better quantitative analysis of clinically relevant features of retinal pathology.

[1]  J. Duker,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of macular lesions associated with optic nerve head pits. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[2]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: A new tool for glaucoma diagnosis , 1995, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[5]  E Reichel,et al.  Topography of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[6]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[7]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[8]  Mauricio E Pons,et al.  Assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer internal reflectivity in eyes with and without glaucoma using optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  E Reichel,et al.  Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Taylor,et al.  Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Duker,et al.  Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Robin Ray,et al.  Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  Evaluation of focal defects of the nerve fiber layer using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  Coherence-Enhancing Diffusion Filtering , 1999, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  M. Hee,et al.  Artifacts in optical coherence tomography topographic maps. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Browning Interobserver variability in optical coherence tomography for macular edema. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  E A Swanson,et al.  Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  E Reichel,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of central serous chorioretinopathy. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  Image enhancement and denoising by complex diffusion processes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Speckle in optical coherence tomography. , 1999, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  R Birngruber,et al.  Argon laser retinal lesions evaluated in vivo by optical coherence tomography. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  Angelika Unterhuber,et al.  Optophysiology of the Human RetinaWith Functional Ultrahigh Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography , 2006 .

[26]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  A Erginay,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Carmen A Puliafito,et al.  Automated detection of retinal layer structures on optical coherence tomography images. , 2005, Optics express.

[29]  P. Carpineto,et al.  Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[30]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.