QFT bounds for robust stability specifications defined on the open‐loop function

In the framework of quantitative feedback theory, this paper develops a new method to compute robust stability bounds. This is of special interest when stability is defined directly on the open‐loop function. Thus, ignorance of the plant gain and phase shift can be specifically and independently considered. Furthermore, upper and lower stability margins for both gain and phase can be chosen. However, classical quantitative feedback theory stability specifications are defined as constraining the peak magnitude of closed‐loop functions, which lack the said flexibility. Once the upper tolerance has been defined, all stability margins are determined. Moreover, confining the most restrictive stability margin may result in other excessive margins. However, the stability bounds of the new approach guard just the required distance from the open‐loop frequency response to the critical point. This allows maximization of the available feedback in the functional bandwidth and minimization of the cost of feedback beyond the crossover frequency, provided that the open‐loop frequency response is shaped to closely follow the stability bounds. It should be noted that the new bound computation algorithm performs few and simple arithmetic operations. This makes it far more efficient than traditional methods. The flight altitude control of an unmanned aerial vehicle is proposed as a practical example to show the new method's potential benefits.

[1]  Shih-Feng Yang,et al.  Generation of QFT bounds for robust tracking specifications for plants with affinely dependent uncertainties , 2011 .

[2]  Shih-Feng Yang,et al.  Efficient algorithm for computing QFT bounds , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[3]  Montserrat Gil-Martínez,et al.  Analytical formulation to compute QFT bounds: The envelope method , 2009 .

[4]  Shih-Feng Yang,et al.  An improvement of QFT plant template generation for systems with affinely dependent parametric uncertainties , 2009, J. Frankl. Inst..

[5]  Juan José Martin-Romero,et al.  QFT Templates for Plants With a High Number of Uncertainty Parameters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Per-Olof Gutman,et al.  Recursive grid methods to compute value sets and Horowitz–Sidi bounds , 2007 .

[7]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  Improvements on the computation of boundaries in QFT , 2006 .

[8]  Paluri S. V. Nataraj,et al.  Interval QFT: a mathematical and computational enhancement of QFT , 2002 .

[9]  Boris J. Lurie,et al.  System Architecture Trades Using Bode-Step Control Design , 2002 .

[10]  I. Horowitz Survey of quantitative feedback theory (QFT) , 2001 .

[11]  Steven J. Rasmussen,et al.  Quantitative feedback theory: fundamentals and applications: C. H. Houpis and S. J. Rasmussen; Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999, ISBN: 0-8247-7872-3 , 2001, Autom..

[12]  Paluri S. V. Nataraj,et al.  Computation of QFT Bounds for Robust Sensitivity and Gain-Phase Margin Specifications , 2000 .

[13]  Boris J. Lurie,et al.  Classical feedback control with MATLAB and Simulink , 2012 .

[14]  Marcel J. Sidi,et al.  Design of Robust Control Systems: From Classical to Modern Practical Approaches , 2001 .

[15]  Isaac Horowitz,et al.  Quantitative feedback design theory : QFT , 1993 .

[16]  Oded Yaniv,et al.  Multi-input/single-output computer-aided control design using the quantitative feedback theory , 1993 .

[17]  I. Horowitz Synthesis of feedback systems , 1963 .

[18]  H. W. Bode,et al.  Network analysis and feedback amplifier design , 1945 .