Producing synthetic natural gas from microalgae via supercritical water gasification: A techno-economic sensitivity analysis

A techno-economic sensitivity analysis of the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) via catalytic supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of microalgae produced in raceway ponds (RP), tubular-, or flat-panel-airlift photobioreactors (FPA-PBR) has been perfomed. The aim of combining microalgae production with SCWG is to close material flows with respect to water and nutrients, the so called SunCHem process. The sensitivity analysis is based on an annual production of 86,500 t of microalgae biomass yielding 1.14 PJ of methane per year. The sensitivity analysis showed that with an annual algae productivity of 38.5 t per hectare of RP an energy return on energy invested (EROEI) of 1.84 can be achieved for the self-sufficient base case scenario. An SNG production cost of 194 (sic) GJ (1) was obtained for RP. An EROEI of 0.08 was calculated for tubular PBR with a productivity of 75.1 t ha (-1) a(-1) in the base case scenario and thus was found to be inappropriate for SNG production. EROEI for FPA-PBR with an assumed microalgae productivity of 79 t ha (1) a (1) was found to be 1.01 in the base case scenario and an SNG production cost of 266 (sic) GJ (1). With significantly more optimistic assumptions concerning microalgae productivity, energy input and capital requirement with respect to microalgae cultivation, an EROEI of 3.6-5.8 and SNG production costs of 53-90 (sic) GJ (1) were found for RP, whereas for FPA-PBR an EROEI of 2-3.7 and SNG production costs of 30-103 (sic) GJ (1) were obtained. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Olaf Kruse,et al.  Future prospects of microalgal biofuel production systems. , 2010, Trends in plant science.

[2]  Y. Chisti.  Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[3]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Assessment of the Technological Development and Economic Potential of Photobioreactors , 2009 .

[4]  F. Vogel.  Catalytic Conversion of High‐Moisture Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas in Supercritical Water , 2010 .

[5]  J. Benemann,et al.  Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae; Close-Out Report , 1998 .

[6]  L. Laurens,et al.  Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: Review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics , 2010 .

[7]  René H Wijffels,et al.  Potential of sponges and microalgae for marine biotechnology. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[8]  F. Vogel,et al.  Continuous salt precipitation and separation from supercritical water. Part 1: Type 1 salts , 2010 .

[9]  D. Allen,et al.  Energy-water nexus for mass cultivation of algae. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  K. Kadam.  Microalgae Production from Power Plant Flue Gas: Environmental Implications on a Life Cycle Basis , 2001 .

[11]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  F H Mohn,et al.  Harvesting of micro algal biomass , 1988 .

[13]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Optimal process design for the polygeneration of SNG, power and heat by hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: Process optimisation for selected substrates , 2011 .

[14]  F. Vogel,et al.  Continuous salt precipitation and separation from supercritical water. Part 3: Interesting effects in processing type 2 salt mixtures , 2012 .

[15]  Frédéric Vogel,et al.  SunCHem: an integrated process for the hydrothermal production of methane from microalgae and CO2 mitigation , 2009, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[16]  F. Vogel,et al.  Continuous salt precipitation and separation from supercritical water. Part 2. Type 2 salts and mixtures of two salts , 2010 .

[17]  J. V. Beilen,et al.  Why microalgal biofuels won't save the internal combustion machine , 2010 .

[18]  Razif Harun,et al.  Technoeconomic analysis of an integrated microalgae photobioreactor, biodiesel and biogas production facility. , 2011 .

[19]  Benoit Guieysse,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of broth temperature in outdoor photobioreactors. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  C. Posten,et al.  Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production , 2008, BioEnergy Research.

[21]  Frédéric Vogel,et al.  Catalytic gasification of algae in supercritical water for biofuel production and carbon capture , 2009 .

[22]  Paul T. Anastas,et al.  Handbook of green chemistry , 2009 .

[23]  François Maréchal,et al.  Optimal process design for the polygeneration of SNG, power and heat by hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: Thermo-economic process modelling and integration , 2011 .

[24]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. , 2003, Biotechnology advances.

[25]  F. G. Acién,et al.  Characterization of a flat plate photobioreactor for the production of microalgae , 2008 .

[26]  Michael A. Borowitzka,et al.  Micro-algal biotechnology. , 1988 .

[27]  A. Kiperstok,et al.  Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in open ponds and photobioreactors. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[28]  Olivier Bernard,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[29]  Mark A. White,et al.  Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Maria J Barbosa,et al.  Microalgal production--a close look at the economics. , 2011, Biotechnology advances.