A Bayesian network approach for predicting seismic liquefaction based on interpretive structural modeling

ABSTRACT The Bayesian network (BN) is a type of graphical network based on probabilistic inference that has been gradually applied to assessment of seismic liquefaction potential. However, how to construct a robust BN remains underexplored in this field. This paper aims to present an efficient hybrid approach combining domain knowledge and data to construct a BN that facilitates the integration of multiple factors and the quantification of uncertainties within a network model to assess seismic liquefaction. Initially, only using given domain knowledge, a naive network model can be constructed using interpretive structural modeling. Thereafter, some effective information about the naive model is provided to construct a robust model using structural learning of BN from historic data. Finally, the returning predictive results and the predictive results are compared to other methods including non-probabilistic and probabilistic models for seismic liquefaction using the metrics of the overall accuracy, the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic, prediction, recall and F1 score. The methodology proposed in this paper achieved better performance, and we discussed the power and value of the proposed approach at the end of this paper, which suggest that BN is a good alternative tool for seismic liquefaction prediction.

[1]  Jozef Gemela,et al.  Financial analysis using Bayesian networks , 2001 .

[2]  Sang Hyoung Lee,et al.  Bayesian network-based behavior control for skilligent robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Daniel Nikovski,et al.  Constructing Bayesian Networks for Medical Diagnosis from Incomplete and Partially Correct Statistics , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[4]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data , 1992, Machine-mediated learning.

[5]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  Regression Models For Evaluating Liquefaction Probability , 1988 .

[6]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Bayesian updating of KJHH model for prediction of maximum ground settlement in braced excavations using centrifuge data , 2012 .

[7]  Isam Shahrour,et al.  Influence of fines on the resistance to liquefaction of a clayey sand , 2004 .

[8]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Bayesian network for characterizing model uncertainty of liquefaction potential evaluation models , 2012 .

[9]  K. C. Iyer,et al.  Hierarchical Structuring of PPP Risks Using Interpretative Structural Modeling , 2010 .

[10]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[11]  Prem Vrat,et al.  Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation , 1990 .

[12]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Use of Rayleigh Waves in Liquefaction Studies , 1985 .

[13]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Bayesian network modeling of correlated random variables drawn from a Gaussian random field , 2011 .

[14]  Gokhan Saygili,et al.  Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil deposits using artificial neural networks , 2007 .

[15]  P. Robertson,et al.  Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test , 1998 .

[16]  Young-Su Kim,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Sands Containing Plastic Fines with Different Plasticity , 2013 .

[17]  Thomas Oommen,et al.  Validation and Application of Empirical Liquefaction Models , 2010 .

[18]  Lianyang Zhang,et al.  A simple method for evaluating liquefaction potential from shear wave velocity , 2010 .

[19]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Bayesian probabilistic network approach for managing earthquake risks of cities , 2011 .

[20]  Wen-Jong Chang,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLAY CONTENT ON LIQUEFACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF GAP-GRADED CLAYEY SANDS , 2008 .

[21]  Yahya Y. Bayraktarli APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN PROBABILISTIC NETWORKS FOR LIQUEFACTION OF SOIL , 2006 .

[22]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Combat Identification with Bayesian Networks , 2002 .

[23]  R. Shankar,et al.  An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries , 2003 .

[24]  Hareton K. N. Leung,et al.  Assessment of Catastrophic Risk Using Bayesian Network Constructed from Domain Knowledge and Spatial Data , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Pijush Samui Least square support vector machine and relevance vector machine for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential using SPT , 2011 .

[26]  Yi Li,et al.  Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network: A case study in Beichuan, China , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part II. Diagnosis of a specific distressed dam , 2011 .

[28]  Mahesh Pal,et al.  Support vector machines‐based modelling of seismic liquefaction potential , 2006 .

[29]  Sunny Ye Fang,et al.  First-Order Reliability Method for Probabilistic Liquefaction Triggering Analysis using CPT , 2006 .

[30]  A. Goh,et al.  Support vector machines: Their use in geotechnical engineering as illustrated using seismic liquefaction data , 2007 .

[31]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity , 2000 .

[32]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part I. Global-level characteristics based on a dam distress database , 2011 .

[33]  Xinhua Xue,et al.  Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[34]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Analysis of human risks due to dam-break floods—part 1: a new model based on Bayesian networks , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[35]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Neural-Network Modeling of CPT Seismic Liquefaction Data , 1996 .

[36]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Sequential minimax search for a maximum , 1953 .

[37]  Timothy D. Stark,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance Using CPT and Field Case Histories , 1995 .

[38]  Luis M. de Campos,et al.  Bayesian network models for hierarchical text classification from a thesaurus , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[39]  Peng Gang Fuzzy probability comprehensive evaluation method for sand liquefaction during earthquake , 2008 .

[40]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Appraising cone penetration test based liquefaction resistance evaluation methods: artificial neural network approach , 1999 .

[41]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes , 1982 .

[42]  Thomas Oommen,et al.  Sampling Bias and Class Imbalance in Maximum-likelihood Logistic Regression , 2011 .

[43]  Lili Liu,et al.  Modeling method of cascading crisis events based on merging Bayesian Network , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[45]  Lianyang Zhang,et al.  Predicting seismic liquefaction potential of sands by optimum seeking method , 1998 .

[46]  Hans-Christian Pfohl,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks , 2011 .

[47]  Sanjay Kumar Jha,et al.  Reliability analysis of soil liquefaction based on standard penetration test , 2009 .

[48]  A. Goh Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks , 1994 .