Flutter and buffeting are two important phenomena of long-span bridges susceptible to wind actions. When the wind velocity increases to the bridge flutter velocity, an initial or self-excited multi-frequency vibration in laminar flow becomes single-frequency flutter instability. Similarly, in turbulent flow, the multi-frequency buffeting vibration develops into a single-frequency dominated divergent vibration that can also be interpreted as flutter instability. Even though this transition from buffeting to flutter was observed in wind tunnel tests, the mechanism of transition from multi-frequency type of buffeting to single-frequency type of flutter has not been well demonstrated numerically. Some existent explanations on the occurrence of flutter are very generic and even somewhat confusing. An attempt to reinvestigate numerically the transition of these two phenomena was made in the present study. The established procedure demonstrates numerically how a pre-flutter multi-frequency free vibration and a multi-frequency buffeting vibration merge into a single-frequency dominated flutter at the flutter critical wind velocity. It is concluded that the modal coupling effect forces all modes to vibrate mainly in a frequency close to the oscillation frequency of the critical flutter mode. The oscillation frequency of each mode itself does not merge to that of the critical mode. As a result, some confusing concepts in flutter vibrations are clarified and the mechanisms of the vibration transition process are better understood. Numerical analyses of the Humen suspension bridge with a main span of 888 m were conducted to facilitate the discussions.
[1]
Nicholas P. Jones,et al.
Aeroelastic Analysis of Cable‐Stayed Bridges
,
1990
.
[2]
Pedro Albrecht,et al.
Flutter and Buffeting Analysis. II: Luling and Deer Isle Bridges
,
1999
.
[3]
Emil Simiu,et al.
Wind effects on structures : fundamentals and applications to design
,
1996
.
[4]
A. Kareem,et al.
On the Veering of Eigenvalue Loci and the Physics of Coupled Flutter of Bridges
,
2001
.
[5]
P.K.K. Lee,et al.
TIME DOMAIN BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF SUSPENSION BRIDGES SUBJECTED TO TURBULENT WIND WITH EFFECTIVE ATTACK ANGLE
,
2000
.
[6]
Y. K. Lin,et al.
Stochastic Stability of Bridges Considering Coupled Modes: II
,
1988
.
[7]
Emil Simiu,et al.
Wind Effects on Structures: An Introduction to Wind Engineering
,
1980
.
[8]
Robert H. Scanlan,et al.
Interpreting Aeroelastic Models of Cable‐Stayed Bridges
,
1987
.
[9]
Pedro Albrecht,et al.
Finite Element‐Based Flutter Analysis of Cable‐Suspended Bridges
,
1992
.
[10]
Robert H. Scanlan,et al.
The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: Flutter theory†
,
1978
.
[11]
T.J.A. Agar,et al.
Aerodynamic flutter analysis of suspension bridges by a modal technique
,
1989
.
[12]
Pedro Albrecht,et al.
Flutter derivatives based random parametric excitation aerodynamic analysis
,
2000
.
[13]
Virote Boonyapinyo,et al.
Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach
,
1999
.