Computationally light attitude controls for resource limited nano-spacecraft

Nano-spacecraft have emerged as practical alternatives to large conventional spacecraft for specific missions (e.g. as technology demonstrators) due to their low cost and short time to launch. However these spacecraft have a number of limitations compared to larger spacecraft: a tendency to tumble post-launch; lower computational power in relation to larger satellites and limited propulsion systems due to small payload capacity. As a result new methodologies for attitude control are required to meet the challenges associated with nano-spacecraft. This paper presents two novel attitude control methods to tackle two phases of a mission using zero-propellant (i) the detumbling post-launch and (ii) the repointing of nano-spacecraft. The first method consists of a time-delayed feedback control law which is applied to a magnetically actuated spacecraft and used for autonomous detumbling. The second uses geometric mechanics to construct zero propellant reference manoeuvres which are then tracked using quaternion feedback control. The problem of detumbling a magnetically actuated spacecraft in the first phase of a mission is conventionally tackled using BDOT control. This involves applying controls which are proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic field. However, real systems contain sensor noise which can lead to discontinuities in the signal and problems with computing the numerical derivative. This means that a noise filter must be used and this increases the computational overhead of the system. It is shown that a timedelayed feedback control law is advantageous as the use of a delayed signal rather than a derivative negates the need for such a filter, thus reducing computational overhead. The second phase of the mission is the repointing of the spacecraft to a desired target. Exploiting the analytic solutions of the angular velocities of a symmetric spacecraft and further using Lax pair integration it is possible to derive exact equations of the natural motions including the time evolution of the quaternions. It is shown that parametric optimisation of these solutions can be used to generate low torque reference motions that match prescribed boundary conditions on the initial and final configurations. Through numerical simulation it is shown that these references can be tracked using nanospacecraft reaction wheels while eigenaxis rotations, used for comparison, are more torque intensive. As the method requires parameter optimisation as opposed to optimisation methods that require numerical integration, the computational effort is reduced.

[1]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Multiple target selection and obstacle avoidance using potential function guidance method , 2001 .

[2]  E Schöll,et al.  Delayed feedback control of noise-induced patterns in excitable media. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  J Giesselmann,et al.  Development of an active magnetic attitude determination and control system for picosatellites on highly inclined circular low earth orbits , 2006 .

[4]  Wendy,et al.  A B-Dot Acquisition Controller for the RADARSAT Spacecraft , 2022 .

[5]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  LINEAR TIME-DELAY FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A PATHOLOGICAL RHYTHM IN A CARDIAC CONDUCTION MODEL , 1997 .

[6]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Motion control of drift-free, left-invariant systems on Lie groups , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  K. Spindler,et al.  Optimal attitude control of a rigid body , 1996 .

[8]  P. Crouch,et al.  Spacecraft attitude control and stabilization: Applications of geometric control theory to rigid body models , 1984 .

[9]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Time-Delayed Feedback Control in Astrodynamics , 2009 .

[10]  Kestutis Pyragas Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback , 1992 .

[11]  Suppressing noise-induced intensity pulsations in semiconductor lasers by means of time-delayed feedback , 2008 .

[12]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Spacecraft attitude determination and control , 1978 .

[13]  Rafael Wisniewski,et al.  Fully magnetic attitude control for spacecraft subject to gravity gradient , 1999, Autom..

[14]  Visarath In,et al.  REAL-TIME EXPERIMENTAL CONTROL OF A SYSTEM IN ITS CHAOTIC AND NONCHAOTIC REGIMES , 1997 .

[15]  Wei Kang,et al.  Pseudospectral Optimal Control Theory Makes Debut Flight, Saves NASA $1M in Under Three Hours , 2007 .

[16]  Nadjim Horri,et al.  Optimal geometric motion planning for a spin-stabilized spacecraft , 2012, Syst. Control. Lett..

[17]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  Vehicle dynamics and control , 2005 .

[18]  V. Flunkert,et al.  Suppressing noise-induced intensity pulsations in semiconductor lasers by means of time-delayed feedback , 2007, 2008 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2008 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science.

[19]  V. Jurdjevic Geometric control theory , 1996 .

[20]  Kestutis Pyragas,et al.  Experimental control of chaos by delayed self-controlling feedback , 1993 .

[21]  Eckehard Schöll,et al.  Control of noise-induced oscillations by delayed feedback , 2004 .

[22]  Haim Weiss,et al.  Quarternion feedback regulator for spacecraft eigenaxis rotations , 1989 .

[23]  P. Hughes Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics , 1986 .

[24]  Bong Wie,et al.  Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control , 1998 .