bic chamber at only 1 center, making it impossible to process autologous FMT stool anaerobically at each trial site. We believe, however, that the risk of bias from this is minimal. Autologous stool samples were processed at room temperature and frozen within minutes of laboratory delivery. Therefore, there was not sufficient time, nor optimized growth conditions, for significant proliferation of oxygentolerant organisms, such as Enterobacteriaceae, during processing. While the relative proportion of oxygen-tolerant, potentially pathogenic bacteria was likely to be higher following aerobic processing, the overall number of such organisms would not likely have been increased. Although the autologous stool may have been devoid of some beneficial organisms due to aerobic processing, this would not have introduced significantly increased numbers of pathogens and thus should not have significantly reduced the placebo response. Of course, much of this explanation is supposition based on best evidence available, and the answer can only be clarified with a randomized clinical trial comparing anaerobic and aerobic donor FMT groups. It is not clear that steroids potentiate the effect of donor FMT because there are no human trials powered to assess this. Benech and colleagues cite data from a murine model in support of this notion.3 Post hoc analyses from 2 previous randomized FMT studies in humans with ulcerative colitis demonstrated no effect of steroid therapy on remission.4,5 Paramsothy et al4 reported that 0 of 9 patients in the donor FMT group who entered the trial while taking steroids achieved remission. Conversely, in the post hoc logistical regression analysis in our study, oral steroids were associated with a greater reduction in total Mayo score following donor FMT. Therefore, the data from human trials are inconsistent on this question. It is also unclear whether the length of time receiving steroid therapy prior to enrollment would influence any putative effect. The patients entering our trial taking steroid therapy underwent a mandatory steroid taper, which would have diminished any late steroid effect as steroid therapy ongoing at week 8 was considered therapeutic failure. In addition, only a minority of patients entered the study receiving steroid therapy, and there was no statistical difference between the number of patients taking steroids in the donor FMT and autologous FMT groups (8/38 [21%] vs 11/35 [31%]; odds ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.23-1.80]; P = .61). Therefore, any differences in steroid therapy duration prior to enrollment are unlikely to have significantly influenced the rate of remission overall.
[1]
T. Helbich,et al.
Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.
,
2019,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[2]
C. Langlotz,et al.
Effect of Clinical Decision Support-Generated Report Cards Versus Real-Time Alerts on Primary Care Provider Guideline Adherence for Low Back Pain Outpatient Lumbar Spine MRI Orders.
,
2019,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
John P A Ioannidis,et al.
Curbing Unnecessary and Wasted Diagnostic Imaging.
,
2019,
JAMA.
[4]
E. V. van Beek,et al.
Coronary CT Angiography and 5‐Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction
,
2018,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
D. Levin,et al.
Reducing Inappropriate Use of Diagnostic Imaging Through the Choosing Wisely Initiative.
,
2017,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[6]
D. Levin,et al.
The Overuse of Diagnostic Imaging and the Choosing Wisely Initiative
,
2012,
Annals of Internal Medicine.
[7]
J. Fleg,et al.
Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
,
2012,
The New England journal of medicine.
[8]
David M Studdert,et al.
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.
,
2005,
JAMA.