Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method.

PURPOSE To assess the variability and reproducibility of a volumetric calcium score calculated with electron-bean computed tomographic (CT) scans of coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two sets of electron-beam CT scans were obtained in patients with coronary calcification (group A) or known risk factors for coronary arterial disease (group B). The second set or scans was obtained after a brief interval (group A, n = 52) or after 1 year with no risk modification (group B, n = 27). Traditional (plaque area and attenuation) and volumetric calcium scores were calculated for each patient and lesion. RESULTS The median percentage change for individual lesions in group A was 13% for the volumetric and 19% for the traditional score. The overall reduction in error with the volumetric score was 40% (P < .001). The median percentage change for group A patient totals was 9% for the volumetric and 15% for the traditional score (P < .001). In group B patients, the median volumetric score increased by 44% after 1 year. CONCLUSION The volumetric score showed better reproducibility than the traditional score, and its variability was considerably less than the score increase in untreated patients after 1 year. The reproducibility of the volumetric method makes it useful for assessing the progression of coronary arterial disease on serial electron-beam CT studies.

[1]  H. Mabuchi,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcification using ultrafast computed tomography: Reproducibility of measurements , 1993, Coronary artery disease.

[2]  M A Proschan,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Udupa,et al.  Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  David Levin Multidimensional Reconstruction by Set-valued Approximations , 1986 .

[6]  J. Canty,et al.  Fast computed tomography detection of coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Comparison with angiography in patients < 50 years old. , 1994, Circulation.

[7]  W. Janowitz,et al.  Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  David H. Blankenhorn,et al.  CORONARY ARTERIAL CALCIFICATION A REVIEW , 1961 .

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  H. C. Stary,et al.  The sequence of cell and matrix changes in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries in the first forty years of life. , 1990, European heart journal.

[11]  S. Rich,et al.  Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  C H McCollough,et al.  Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise? , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  D J Conces,et al.  Measurement of coronary artery calcium with dual-slice helical CT compared with coronary angiography: evaluation of CT scoring methods, interobserver variations, and reproducibility. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  B. Thompson,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. Detrano,et al.  Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. , 1996, American heart journal.

[16]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.